Table 1.
Sample no. | Line number | Average tiller number | Leaf rolling on treatment day 7 | Leaf drying on treatment day 7 | Leaf rolling on treatment day 14 | Leaf drying on treatment day 14 | Recovery after 7 days (%) | Observed phenotype |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BD-33-24-4 | 10 | H | N | H | N | 90–100 | HT |
2 | BD-33-24-5 | 12 | H | N | H | N | 90–100 | HT |
3 | BD-33-24-6 | 15 | H | N | H | N | 90–100 | HT |
4 | BD-33-24-7 | 10 | H | N | H | N | 90–100 | HT |
5 | BD-33-24-9 | 10 | H | N | H | N | 90–100 | HT |
6 | BD-33-29-1 | 9 | D | T | H | L | 70–89 | MT |
7 | BD-33-30-1 | 10 | D | T | H | L | 70–89 | MT |
8 | BD-33-34-1 | 10 | D | T | H | L | 70–89 | MT |
9 | BPT Control | 12 | T | A | C | A | 0 | SC |
H Healthy, T tightly rolled, L leaf margin touching, D deep V shape rolling, N no drying, A apparently dead, t tip drying started, C completely wilted, L little drying, HT highly tolerant, MT moderate tolerant, SC susceptible
Phenotyping carried out as per the standard evaluation system of rice at IRRI on 6 plants per line