Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan 18;25(2):308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.003

Table 1.

State Medical Marijuana Laws, 1990-2010

State MML/Amendment Effective Yeara Dispensaries Home Supply

Legally Operatingb De Facto Operating Home Cultivation Caregiver Modelc Multiple Patients per Caregiver Collective Growing
Alaska 1999 No No Yes Provider No Law Silent
California 1997 No Yes Yes Caretaker Yes Law Silent
2004 Yes Yes Yes Caretaker Yes Allowed
Colorado 2001 No No Yes Caretaker Yes Law Silent
2005 No Yes Yes Caretaker Yes Law Silent
2010 Yes Yes Yes Provider Yes Prohibited
Hawaii 2001 No No Yes Caretaker No Prohibited
Maine 2000 No No Yes Caretaker Yes Law Silent
2010 No No Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
Maryland 2004 No No No n/a n/a n/a
Michigan 2009 No No Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
2010 No Yes Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
Montana 2005 No No Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
2009 No Yes Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
Nevada 2002 No No Yes Caretaker No Law Silent
New Mexico 2007 No No No n/a n/a n/a
2008 No No Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
2009 Yes Yes Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
Oregon 1999 No No Yes Caretaker Yes Law Silent
2000 No No Yes Caretaker Yes Prohibited
2006 No No Yes Provider Yes Prohibited
2009 No Yes Yes Provider Yes Prohibited
Rhode Island 2006 No No Yes Provider Yes Law Silent
Vermont 2004 No No Yes Provider No Law Silent
Washington 1999 No No Yes Caretaker No Law Silent
2009 No Yes Yes Caretaker No Law Silent
a

The indicated year reflects laws effective as of July 1st. Note that this table does not reflect MML statutes or other legal changes that came into effect after 2010, including new laws in Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.

b

During the study period 1990-2010, both Maine (2010) and Rhode Island (2009) enacted dispensary laws, but the first dispensaries did not become operational until March 2011 and April 2013, respectively.

c

Under the caretaker model, designated caregivers assisting with home cultivation must be a family member and/or individual with prior significant caretaking responsibilities; under the provider model, designated caregivers can be most any adult who has agreed to assist the patient. Note that Alaska’s original Measure 8 (effective: 3/4/99) articulated a caretaker model, but immediate amending legislation S.B. 94 (effective: 6/2/99) changed this to a provider model.