Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan 18;25(2):308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.003

Table 3.

Differences-in-Differences Estimates of the Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on Potency (THC%), 1990-2010

Variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Medical Marijuana Law 3.48 (0.59)*** 1.49 (0.66)** 0.55 (0.56) 0.54 (0.56) 0.53 (0.55)
Decriminalization Policy 2.61 (0.95)*** 2.62 (1.05)**
Log Outdoor Plots Seized per 100,000 Population (Lagged 1 Year) 0.01 (0.16)
Log Indoor Grows Seized per 100,000 Population (Lagged 1 Year) -0.27 (0.15)*
Seizure-to-Analysis Lag (Months) -0.14 (0.01)*** -0.11 (0.01)*** -0.11 (0.01)*** -0.11 (0.01)***
% Male 0.56 (0.30)* -0.31 (0.72) -0.31 (0.71) -0.39 (0.74)
%Non-Hispanic White 0.03 (0.01)* 0.01 (0.10) 0.02 (0.10) 0.01 (0.09)
% Aged 20-29 -0.24 (0.15) -0.24 (0.13)* -0.22 (0.13)* -0.22 (0.13)*
% Aged 30-59 -0.28 (0.16)* -0.12 (0.26) -0.05 (0.25) -0.06 (0.24)
% Aged 60+ 0.06 (0.11) 0.08 (0.28) 0.11 (0.27) 0.05 (0.27)
Log per Capita Income (Thousands) 8.20 (1.06)*** 3.40 (2.40) 3.48 (2.28) 3.23 (2.33)
Log Population (Hundred Thousands) -0.33 (0.19)* -4.49 (3.96) -4.57 (4.00) -4.76 (4.03)
Constant 5.60 (0.51)*** -34.70 (18.88)* 36.03 (49.86) 31.28 (48.39) 38.63 (52.14)
State Fixed-Effects No No Yes Yes Yes
Year Fixed-Effects No No Yes Yes Yes
R2adj 8.7% 29.1% 33.8% 33.8% 33.9%

Note: Cluster robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. N = 39,157.

Significance levels:

*

10%,

**

5%,

***

1%