Skip to main content
. 2014 May 15;92(100):381–397. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060

Table 5.

The eight different simulation scenarios, each with its own same sample sizes and different variances. The distributions of the statistic (F or G) for each pair of variance configuration within scenario were compared using the KS test. The letters in the last column (marked with a star, ⋆) indicate the variance configurations represented in the pairwise comparisons shown in Fig. 4 and results shown in Table 6.

Simulation scenario Sample sizes for each vg Variances for each vg
1 8, 4 5, 1 (a)
1.2, 1 (b)
1, 1 (c)
1, 1.2 (d)
1, 5 (e)
2 20, 5 5, 1 (a)
1.2, 1 (b)
1, 1 (c)
1, 1.2 (d)
1, 5 (e)
3 80, 30 5, 1 (a)
1.2, 1 (b)
1, 1 (c)
1, 1.2 (d)
1, 5 (e)
4 40, 30, 20, 10 15, 10, 5, 1 (a)
3.6, 2.4, 1.2, 1 (b)
1, 1, 1, 1 (c)
1, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 (d)
1, 5, 10, 15 (e)
5 4, 4 1, 1 (a)
1, 1.2 (b)
1, 5 (c)
6 20, 20 1, 1 (a)
1, 1.2 (b)
1, 5 (c)
7 4, 4, 4, 4 1, 1, 1, 1 (a)
1, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 (b)
1, 5, 10, 15 (c)
8 20, 20, 20, 20 1, 1, 1, 1 (a)
1, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 (b)
1, 5, 10, 15 (c)