TABLE 2.
Distribution of the LAM sublineages and SITs in this study and in selected world regionsd
| SIT, sublineage, and/or genomic deletion | No. of isolates/total no. of LAM isolates tested |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUa this study | RU, Tulab | BEa | KZa | BGa | BRc | CRc | USAc | ZAc | TNc | NLc | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 933 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Orphans/new | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| 42, RD-Rio, RD174 | 1 | 45/52 | 11/11 | 7/16 | 1/1 | 0/46 | 5/19 | ||||
| 60, RD-Rio, RD174 | 3/6 | 0/19 | 1/1 | ||||||||
| 20, RD-Rio, RD174 | 4 | 20/20 | 3/3 | 5/6 | 15/15 | 3/3 | |||||
| 1321, RD-Rio, RD174 | 2 | ||||||||||
| 42, RD115 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 60, RD115 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 42, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 46 | 6 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
| 60, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 1277, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 150, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 766, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 2 | ||||||||||
| 254, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 4 | ||||||
| 506, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 803, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 4 | ||||||||||
| 264, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 2 | ||||||||||
| 444, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 5 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| 267, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 3 | ||||||||||
| 263, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 2 | ||||||||||
| 252, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 17 | 27 | 5 | ||||||||
| 496, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 5 | ||||||||||
| 560, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 3 | ||||||||||
| 266, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 4 | 1 | 52 | ||||||||
| 251, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 1076, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 4, LAM-RUS, RD115 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Orphans/new, LAM-RUS-RUS | 6 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| Total RD-Rio (all SITs considered) | 7/135 | 0/39 | 0/81 | 0/30 | 0/3 | 131/254 | 34/42 | 33/51 | 37/117 | 0/46 | 22/72 |
| Total LAM-RUS (all SITs considered) | 124/135 | 39/39 | 80/81 | 29/30 | 1/3 | ||||||
Data from this study.
Data reported by Gibson et al. (6). Gibson et al. did not show data on RD115, which is why we show the numbers of RD-Rio isolates/all tested LAM isolates in a single cell. Mixed RD-Rio and wild-type isolates were not considered.
Data reported by Ignatova et al. (8). Ignatova et al. did not test for RD115, but we assumed that all LAM-RUS isolates have this deletion; for this reason, LAM-RUS RD115 data from Ignatova et al. are shown.
SIT, spoligotype international type according to the SITVIT_WEB database (12). Abbreviations: RU, Russia; BE, Belarus; KZ, Kazakhstan; BG, Bulgaria; BR, Brazil, CR, French Guiana and Caribbean; ZA, South Africa, TN, Tunisia; NL, Netherlands.