Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun 27;67(1):34–41. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22964

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of IRGN-TV to TV filtering of conventional IRGN reconstructions for pseudorandom subsampling with R = 6 (top, same data as Fig. 2) and accelerated in-vivo imaging with R = 4 (bottom). For TV filtering, optimal regularization parameters were identified by visual inspection: β1=5103 (left, for T2 weighted TSE data) and β2=1.5102 (middle, for FLASH data). Both results for IRGN-TV (right) were obtained using the same parameter set, esp. βmin = 0.