. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 6.

Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2014 Feb 6;181(2):146–161. doi: 10.1667/RR13441.1

TABLE 6.

Detection Efficiencies and Correlations between Automated and Manual Scoring for Various Studies

	RABiT software	Varga et al.	Willems et al.	Decordier et al.
Blood donors	7	114^a	10	1
Investigated doses (Gy)	0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10	0, 2	0, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3	0, 1, 2, 3
Detection efficiency (individual)	69–99%	n.a.	n.a.	46–62%
Correlation between automated and manual scoring (individual)	0.914–0.998	n.a.	n.a.	0.97
Detection efficiency (for mean frequencies)	92–98%	33–38%	71–89%	n.a.
Correlation between automated and manual scoring (for mean micronuclei frequencies)	0.994	0.83	0.917	n.a.

Seventy-three donors in the test sample (27 patients and 46 controls) and 41 donors in the validation sample (21 control and 20 cases).