Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 18;16(9):2362–2365. doi: 10.1021/ol500679w

Table 1. Scope of Michael Addition of 1,1,1-Trifluoromethylketones 1 to Nitroolefins 2a.

graphic file with name ol-2014-00679w_0006.jpg

entry 1 2 3 yield (%)b drc erd
1 1a C6H5 3aa 98 >20:1 95:5
2 1a 2-BrC6H4 3ab 95 >20:1 96.5:3.5
3 1a 2-NO2C6H4 3ac 94 >20:1 97.5:2.5
4 1a 2-CF3C6H4 3ad 96 >20:1 96.5:3.5e
5 1a 2-OMeC6H4 3ae 98 >20:1 94:6
6 1a 3-ClC6H4 3af 98 19:1 93.5:6.5
7 1a 4-BrC6H4 3ag 99 >20:1 95.5:4.5
8 1a 4-NO2C6H4 3ah 99 7:1 95.5:4.5
9 1a 4-CNC6H4 3ai 96 >20:1 96:4
10 1a 4-MeC6H4 3aj 96 8:1 93:7
11 1a 4-OMeC6H4 3ak 91 6:1 86.5:13.5
12 1a 2-thienyl 3al 97 16:1 91.5:8.5
13f 1a 3-N-Ts-indoyl 3am 92 >20:1 87.5:12.5
14 1a CH=CHC6H5 3an 62 (65)g >20:1 87:13
15 1a cyclohexyl 3ao 42 (43)g >20:1 94:6
16 1b 4-BrC6H4 3bg 97 >20:1 96:4
17 1c 4-BrC6H4 3cg 96 >20:1 88:12
18 1d 4-BrC6H4 3dg 97 >20:1 87:13
19 1e 4-BrC6H4 3eg 95 >20:1 93:7
20h 1f C6H5 3fa 73 (82)g >20:1 97:3
a

Reactions were performed with 1 (0.21 mmol) and 2 (0.20 mmol) and proceeded to full conversion as adjudged by TLC.

b

Isolated yield. The diastereomers were not separable, and this represents the combined yield.

c

The diastereomeric ratio was determined by 19F NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude product.

d

The enantiomeric ratio was determined by HPLC or SFC analysis on a chiral stationary phase.

e

The enantiomeric ratio was determined following reduction of 3ad with NaBH4 (see the SI).

f

The reaction was performed at 0 °C for 3 h.

g

Number in parentheses is conversion of nitroolefin as determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude product.

h

The reaction was performed employing QD-TU (10 mol %) at 0 °C for 12 h.