Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Spinal Cord. 2007 Oct 2;46(3):168–175. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102129

Table 3.

Validity of the Pressure Ulcer Scales

Measure Abruzzese Braden Gosnell Norton SCIPUS SCIPUS-A Waterlow
Sensitivity 21.8% 74.7% 18.4% 5.8% 36.8% 88.5%
Specificity 84.6% 56.6% 90.4% 95.6% 84.2% 59.0%
Cut-off N.D ≤10 N.D N.D. ND ≥18 --
Accuracy (15)a 62.2% 62.3% 62.2% 60.8% 65.9% 71.0%
Sensitivity -- -- -- -- 75.6% -- --
Specificity 74.4%
Cut-off ≥6
+ predictive 92.4%
− predictive (14)b 42.7%
AUC (31)c -- 81% (74–88, 95% CI) -- 72 (64–81, 95% CI) -- 78 (70–85, 95% CI) 76% (68–84, 95% CI)
Concurrent (32)d -- 0.48 (Norton) -- −0.56 (Waterlow) -- -- −0.56 (Norton)
−0.06 (Waterlow) −0.49 (Braden) −0.06 (Braden)
Construct (r)
stage of 1st ulcera 0.241 −0.353 0.254 −0.192 0.343 0.488
stage of 1st ulcerd 0.03 −0.28 0.38
# of ulcersa 0.212 −0.431 0.297 −0.197 0.339 0.519

N.D. = Not described/reported

a

For individuals with SCI during initial hospitalization

b

For individuals with SCI during rehabilitation

c

For individuals with SCI in a UK spinal cord injuries unit

d

For a stratified sample of individuals with SCI with a pressure ulcer