Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Spinal Cord. 2007 Oct 2;46(3):168–175. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102129

Table 4.

Utility of the Pressure Ulcer Scales

Measure Abruzzese Braden Gosnell Norton SCIPUS SCIPUS-A Waterlow
Administrative burden Response description s for some scale items are very brief. No indication formal training required. Detailed descriptions for items scoring provided by authors. Training suggested Adequate response descriptions for most items provided. No formal training required Descriptors for item scoring are very brief (32). No indication formal training required. Response descriptions for some scale items are vague. No indication formal training required Response descriptions for some scale items are vague. No indication formal training required Response descriptions for some scale items are vague. No indication formal training required
Respondent burden 5–10 min. 5–10 min. Minimal respondent burden for additional items only 5–10 min. 5–10 min. Minimal burden if test results for diabetes, albumin and hemocrit, etc. are available 10–15 min Minimal burden if test results for albumin and serum creatinine are available 5–10 min. No respondent burden 5–10 min.
Advantages and/or Limitations Most well validated tool generally (10). Additional information and a video taped training manual are available at www.bradenscale.com. Items identified based on data from individuals with SCI Items identified based on data from individuals with SCI