Table 2. Comparison chart showing automated vs. manual scoring.

Total number of high positive (3+) cases	312
Total number of positive (2+) cases	481
Total number of low positive (1+) cases	572
Total number of negative (0+) cases	338
Total number of cases studied	1703
Number of cases where inter-observer score does not match	383
Number of cases where inter-observer scores match but differ from automated analysis	150
Number of cases where automated scores and manual scores differ due to higher stroma to tumor ratio	124
Percentage match between manual and automated scoring before stroma to tumor ratio corrections by higher magnification	77.5%
Percentage match between manual and automated scoring after stroma to tumor ratio corrections by higher magnification	88.6%

Table shows the distribution of samples and a comparison study between the automated and the manual scoring. Total number of cases determines the sample size taking into account for the study. The difference of significance was obtained by two-tailed chi-square test resulting into values of P<0.0001 (CI  = 95%).