Table 5.
Author, Year | No. of Women |
Findings |
---|---|---|
Barbone, 1990[ 12 ] | 818 | COC users: Non-significant increase in yeast vaginitis compared to IUD/tubal ligation group (RR 1.28, 95%, CI 0.98-1.90) |
Gupta, 2000[ 85 ] | 103 | COC users: Decrease in yeast colonization (16% to 5%) done month after COC initiation, p = 0.01 |
Eschenbach,
2000[ 86 ] |
30 | COC users: No change in vaginal yeast colonization between COC initiation and 2 months (10% vs. 10%, p = 0.90) |
Miller, 2000[ 8 ] | 38 | DMPA Users: Decrease in yeast colonization (21% to 8%; p =0.02) between baseline and 6 months after initiation |
Baeten, 2001[ 17 ] | 948 | COC users increased risk of yeast vaginitis (hazard ration 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9); No increase in yeast vaginitis among DMPA users |
Beigi, 2004[ 90 ] | 1248 | DMPA users: Increased risk of vaginal colonization, (adjusted OR 1.4, 95%, CI 1.1 – 1.7, p = 0.02) |