Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;30(1):54–61. doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10239

Table 3. The relationship between clinical factors and chemotherapeutic efficacy in 34 breast cancer patients.

Factor Status CR + PR (%) SD + PD (%) P
ERa 0.698
 Negative 6(31.6) 13(68.4)
 Positive 3(21.4) 11(78.6)
PRb 0.015
 Negative 0(0) 11(100)
 Positive 9(40.9) 13(49.1)
HER2c 0.407
 Negative 2(15.4) 11(84.6)
 Positive 6(35.3) 11(64.7)
ECOG 0.682
 0 7(30.4) 16(69.6)
 1 2(18.2) 9(81.8)
Menopausal status 0.348
 Postmenopausal 6(23.1) 20(76.9)
 Premenopausal 3(37.5) 5(62.5)
Lung metastasis 0.682
 No 7(30.4) 16(69.6)
 Yes 2(18.2) 9(81.8)
Liver metastasis 1.000
 No 5(26.3) 14(73.7)
 Yes 4(26.7) 11(73.3)
Lymph node metastasis 1.000
 No 4(28.6) 10(71.4)
 Yes 5(25.0) 15(75.0)
Chest wall metastasis 1.000
 No 7(25.9) 20(74.1)
 Yes 2(28.6) 5(71.4)
Bone metastasis 0.250
 No 7(35.0) 13(65.9)
 Yes 2(14.3) 12(85.7)
Pleural metastasis 1.000
 No 7(26.9) 19(73.1)
 Yes 2(25.0) 6(75.0)

ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, epidermal growth factor 2. aOne patient with unknown ER status, bone with unknown PR status, and cfour with unknown HER2 status were excluded from the analysis.