Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;12(4):2114–2131. doi: 10.3390/md12042114

Table 1.

Docking scores of current anticholinesterase drugs and marine metabolites into acetylcholinesterase receptors.

Receptor
Ligand 1ACL 1ACJ 1DX6 1DX6 w/H2O 1EVE
All Scores in kJ/mol
Donepezil −59.79 −10.86 −53.65 −61.18 −56.74
Tacrine −35.28 −33.83 −33.91 −34.09 −34.36
Galanthamine −35.28 −35.77 −36.47 −38.76 −36.38
Acetylcholine −31.78 −34.06 −31.99 −31.25 −31.61
Onchidal −47.51 −44.28 −48.55 −47.37 −46.14
Marinoquinoline −30.77 −34.27 −31.09 −30.50 −31.05
Tetracyclopentazulene −42.34 1 −44.03 1 −41.77 2 −42.03 1 −42.51 2
Sargaquinoic acid −67.92 ND −63.14 −69.81 −67.15
Sargachromenol −62.98 −61.45 −62.82 −67.67 −65.16
Monooxofarnesylacetone −59.00 −55.34 −57.81 −50.22 −57.36
Dihydromonooxofarnesylacetone −56.00 −55.38 −55.94 −52.83 −55.51

Docking galanthamine into its own receptor with and without this conserved water molecule both resulted in the crystallographic pose being selected. All inhibitors generated similar scores and poses in each receptor with the exception of donepezil in the 1ACJ receptor and onchidal. The best pose for onchidal was chosen. 1,2 Tetrazacyclopentazulene has two main poses (pose 1 scores are denoted by (1), pose 2 scores are denoted by (2)). ND Sargaquinoic acid would not dock into the 1ACJ receptor due to the Phe-330 ring position occluding the active site gorge (see Supplementary Figure S4).