Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;197(1):401–404. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.158014

Table 1. Simulation results averaged across 1000 replicates of eight-parent MAGIC populations.

M N %MISS %F0 %F %FC %FK %K %B %M
101 200 30 46.9 100 100 86.6 79.8 93.7 96.3
101 200 40 24.5 100 100 85.4 78.8 93.0 95.5
101 200 50 9.8 100 99.6 83.9 77.5 92.0 94.8
101 200 60 3.5 99.9 98.3 81.6 75.7 88.7 93.2
101 400 30 47.3 100 100 88.4 80.3 94.3 96.3
101 400 40 24.9 100 100 87.4 79.4 93.8 95.5
101 400 50 10.1 100 100 86.2 78.2 92.6 94.8
101 400 60 3.6 100 99.7 84.3 76.7 90.7 93.5
201 200 30 47.1 100 100 90.7 83.5 96.7 98.3
201 200 40 24.8 100 100 89.5 82.3 96.3 98.0
201 200 50 10.0 100 100 87.8 80.8 95.4 97.6
201 200 60 2.9 100 99.7 85.2 78.8 91.2 96.8
201 400 30 47.1 100 100 92.1 84.1 97.0 98.3
201 400 40 24.9 100 100 91.3 83.1 96.5 98.0
201 400 50 10.0 100 100 90.1 81.8 96.0 97.6
201 400 60 2.8 100 100 88.2 80.0 94.3 96.8

For each scenario we record the percent of markers with complete founder genotypes originally (%F0), the percentage complete after imputation (%F), the percentage of missing founder genotypes correctly imputed (%FC), the percentage correctly imputed based on the five nearest neighbor markers (%FK), the percentage of missing progeny genotypes correctly imputed based on the five nearest neighbor markers (%K), the percentage correctly imputed with BEAGLE (%B), and the percentage correctly imputed with R/mpMap (%M).