Table 5.
Studies |
Intervention and number of subjects |
Outcome measurement |
Outcomes** (Cured no./Total no., Cured %) |
Treatment effect: |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Cured rate: RR (95% CI) | ||
Li (1998) [28] |
AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief: cured rate based on subjective report |
49/60 |
15/30 |
1.63 (1.12 to 2.38) |
N = 60 |
N = 30 |
81.7% |
50% |
P = 0.01* |
||
| ||||||
Liu (2008) [23] |
AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report |
28/37 |
6/26 |
3.28 (1.58 to 6.77) |
N = 37 |
N = 26 |
76% |
23% |
P = 0.0013* |
||
| ||||||
Shen (1999) [20] |
AMC |
Electro-acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report |
10/27 |
32/41 |
0.47 (0.28 to 0.80) |
N = 27 |
N = 41 |
37% |
78% |
P = 0.005* |
||
| ||||||
Wang (2007) [24] |
AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report |
22/36 |
9/36 |
2.44 (1.31 to 4.56) |
N = 36 |
N = 36 |
61.1% |
25% |
P = 0.005* |
||
| ||||||
Wang (2008) [25] |
AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report |
15/32 |
6/32 |
2.50 (1.11 to 5.62) |
N = 32 |
N = 32 |
46.9% |
18.8% |
P = 0.03* |
||
| ||||||
Wu (2003) [26] |
AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report |
56/74 |
13/52 |
3.03 (1.86 to 4.93) |
N = 74 |
N = 52 |
75% |
25% |
P < 0.0001* |
||
| ||||||
Zhao (2003) [27] | AMC |
Acupuncture |
Pain relief and range of movement: cured rate based on subjective report | 23/25 |
16/24 |
1.38 (1.02 to 1.87) |
N = 25 | N = 24 | 92% | 66.6% | P = 0.04* |
*: P < 0.05 statistically significant difference between two groups. **: Outcomes were measured at the end of last treatment, except for those specifically mentioned.
95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; AMC, acupuncture and moxibustion combined; RR, Relative Risk.