Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 27;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-31

Table 2.

Pooled odds ratio for operative fixation versus conservative treatment in the meta-analysis

Subgroups Sample size
Number of studies Random model
Test of heterogeneity
Egger's test for publication bias
Case Control OR (95% CI) Z p value Q p value I 2 (%) t p value
Overall effects
142
149
7
1.42 (0.33–6.11)
0.47
0.64
16.68
0.01
64
1.52
0.19
Study design
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Retrospective
109
78
4
0.73 (0.15–3.55)
1.21
0.23
6.89
0.08
56
0.99
0.43
  Prospective
26
27
2
1.03 (0.17–6.40)
0.03
0.98
0.92
0.34
0.0
-0.03
0.98
Sample size
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Sample size ≤40
66
81
5
1.36 (0.48–3.86)
0.60
0.55
1.86
0.76
0.0
0.30
0.79
  Sample size >40
102
87
3
1.52 (0.10–24.11)
0.29
0.77
14.35
0.001
86.1
-
-
Ethnicity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  European
122
134
6
1.60 (0.30–8.51)
0.55
0.58
16.64
0.005
70
1.62
0.18
  Asian
20
15
1
0.74 (0.04–12.82)
0.21
0.83
-
-
-
-
-
Operative approaches
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Plate fixation
89
39
2
0.20 (0.05–0.76)
2.35
0.019
1.01
0.315
0.8
-
-
  Tension band wiring fixation
27
26
2
1.77 (0.41–7.70)
0.76
0.445
0.20
0.657
0.0
-
-
  Others 26 84 3 4.01 (0.31–45.26) 1.07 0.285 5.68 0.058 64.8 0.03 0.983