Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2012 Sep 5;19(11):745–748. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2012.2217329

TABLE I.

Comparison of NLM and NLEM in Terms of PSNR and SSIM, at Noise Levels σ = 10, 20, …, 100 (Averaged Over 10 Noise Realizations). Same Parameters Used: S = 21, k = 7, and h = 10σ

Image Method PSNR (dB)
Checker NLM 40.04 35.16 31.74 27.84 25.21 23.13 21.39 19.96 18.84 17.94
NLEM 39.73 34.66 31.66 29.37 26.71 24.76 23.22 21.82 20.50 19.45

Circles NLM 37.31 34.67 31.79 28.82 26.46 24.69 23.10 21.58 20.23 19.03
NLEM 34.27 34.08 32.33 30.05 27.92 26.24 24.87 23.57 22.36 21.16

House NLM 34.22 29.78 26.88 25.21 24.07 23.37 22.78 22.38 22.06 21.81
NLEM 33.96 30.10 27.15 25.39 24.30 23.51 22.96 22.54 22.17 21.95

Barbara NLM 32.37 27.39 24.93 23.52 22.64 22.04 21.62 21.29 21.07 20.88
NLEM 32.11 27.75 25.26 23.84 22.90 22.29 21.83 21.48 21.20 21.01

Lena NLM 33.24 29.31 27.40 26.16 25.24 24.54 24.04 23.66 23.34 23.06
NLEM 33.15 29.45 27.61 26.40 25.53 24.84 24.31 23.90 23.53 23.24

SSIM (%)

Checker NLM 99.41 98.66 97.59 95.51 92.32 88.35 83.37 78.05 72.31 66.47
NLEM 99.36 98.51 97.60 96.30 94.03 91.18 87.81 84.04 79.59 74.51

Circles NLM 96.31 94.02 91.43 88.66 85.79 82.49 78.28 73.28 68.13 63.54
NLEM 95.28 93.60 91.20 88.74 86.30 83.75 80.90 77.85 74.21 70.21

House NLM 86.90 81.80 76.93 72.97 63.57 66.86 64.38 62.24 60.33 58.55
NLEM 86.86 81.25 77.61 73.85 70.51 67.77 65.21 62.96 60.97 59.03

Barbara NLM 89.95 79.48 71.32 65.20 60.79 57.42 54.64 52.58 50.78 49.27
NLEM 90.25 80.38 72.49 66.48 62.04 58.57 55.64 53.45 51.50 49.86

Lena NLM 86.95 80.41 76.45 73.42 70.80 68.45 66.46 64.66 62.94 61.32
NLEM 87.06 80.57 76.77 73.97 71.50 69.21 67.20 65.32 63.52 61.81