Table 4.
The Effect of Established Psychosocial Variables and Anger on PII
| Model: PII Score | B | SE B | β |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Established Psychosocial Variablesa | |||
| FABQ- Work Scale | .07 | .02 | .44* |
| STAI-T | .02 | .02 | .11 |
| PHQ-9 | −.01 | .04 | −.06 |
| Step 2: Anger variables plus mood variablesb | |||
| STAXI-Trait | −.04 | .06 | −.09 |
| AX/IN | .02 | .06 | .06 |
| AX/OUT | .02 | .09 | −.03 |
| AX/CON | −.03 | .05 | −.09 |
| FABQ- Work Scale | .07 | .02 | .44* |
| STAI-T | .01 | .03 | .05 |
| PHQ-9 | −.01 | .04 | −.04 |
Hierarchical regression analysis examining the effect of established psychosocial measures (entered in Step 1) and added anger variables (entered in Step 2) on physical impairment as measured by the Physical Impairment Index.
a
Model accounted for 19.5% of the variance in PII, F(3,67)= 5.40, p<.01.
b
Model accounted for 20.4% of the variance in PII, F(7,63)= 2.30, p<.05.
*
p<.05