Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):501–509. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000019

Table 5.

The Effect of Established Psychosocial Variables and Anger on RMDQ

Model: RMDQ Score B SE B β
Step 1: Established Psychosocial Variablesa

  FABQ- Work Scale .18 .06 .35*
  STAI-T −.02 .07 −.03
  PHQ-9 .17 .11 .20

Step 2: Anger variables plus mood variablesb

  STAXI-Trait −.04 .18 −.03
  AX/IN .28 .18 .22
  AX/OUT −.18 .26 −.10
  AX/CON −.19 .16 −.17
  FABQ- Work Scale .18 .06 .34*
  STAI-T −.11 .09 −.18
  PHQ-9 .15 .11 .17

Hierarchical regression analysis examining the effect of anger variables (entered in Step 1) and other psychosocial variables (entered in Step 2) on patient-rated disability as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

a

Model accounted for 20.4% of the variance in RMDQ, F(3,77)= 6.58, p<.01.

b

Model accounted for 23.9% of the variance in RMDQ, F(7,73)= 3.27, p<.01.

*

p<.05