Table 5.
The Effect of Established Psychosocial Variables and Anger on RMDQ
| Model: RMDQ Score | B | SE B | β |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Established Psychosocial Variablesa | |||
| FABQ- Work Scale | .18 | .06 | .35* |
| STAI-T | −.02 | .07 | −.03 |
| PHQ-9 | .17 | .11 | .20 |
| Step 2: Anger variables plus mood variablesb | |||
| STAXI-Trait | −.04 | .18 | −.03 |
| AX/IN | .28 | .18 | .22 |
| AX/OUT | −.18 | .26 | −.10 |
| AX/CON | −.19 | .16 | −.17 |
| FABQ- Work Scale | .18 | .06 | .34* |
| STAI-T | −.11 | .09 | −.18 |
| PHQ-9 | .15 | .11 | .17 |
Hierarchical regression analysis examining the effect of anger variables (entered in Step 1) and other psychosocial variables (entered in Step 2) on patient-rated disability as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Model accounted for 20.4% of the variance in RMDQ, F(3,77)= 6.58, p<.01.
Model accounted for 23.9% of the variance in RMDQ, F(7,73)= 3.27, p<.01.
p<.05