Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Dec 23;12(1):49–60. doi: 10.1038/nri3132

The bone marrow at the crossroads of blood and immunity

Francois E Mercier 1,2,#, Christine Ragu 1,2,#, David T Scadden 1,2
PMCID: PMC4013788  NIHMSID: NIHMS577417  PMID: 22193770

Abstract

Progenitor cells that are the basis for all blood cell production share the bone marrow with more mature elements of the adaptive immune system. Specialized niches within the bone marrow guide and, at times, constrain the development of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and lineage-restricted immune progenitor cells. Specific niche components are organized into distinct domains to create a diversified landscape in which specialized cell differentiation or population expansion programmes proceed. Local cues that reflect the tissue and organismal state affect cellular interactions to alter the production of a range of cell types. Here, we review the organization of regulatory elements in the bone marrow and discuss how these elements provide a dynamic means for the host to modulate stem cell and adaptive immune cell responses to physiological challenges.


The bone marrow provides a framework of microenvironmental domains or niches that support the function of immune cells and haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Cellular niches are functional compartments within tissues that control cell numbers by providing signals that regulate cell self-renewal, differentiation and quiescence1. Such signals can be transmitted via direct cell contact, growth factors and cytokines, or components of the extracellular matrix. The concept of bone marrow cellular niches was first formulated as a hypothesis more than 30 years ago2, and our understanding of these niches is based in part on the study of model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, as well as on the study of other mammalian tissues, such as the intestine and the epidermis3. Our goal in understanding how HSCs and immune cells process signals from their niche is to develop novel cellular therapies that enhance immune function or haematopoietic reconstitution after injury, or that assist in the treatment of haematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases.

Knowledge about niche components has been obtained through three main types of experiments. First, factors that modulate HSC and immune cell behaviour have been isolated, both in vitro and in vivo (TABLE 1). Second, conventional or intravital microscopy has been used to define the relationship of HSCs and immune cells with their surrounding niche components. Third, genetic mouse models or drug treatments have been used to study the changes in HSC and immune cell function in response to specific alterations in different components of the niche (TABLE 2).

Table 1.

Soluble factors produced by bone marrow niches that contribute to HSC and immune cell maintenance

Soluble factor Bone marrow source Effects on HSCs or immune cells
Factors that affect HSCs
Angiopoietin 1 Osteoblastic cells, nestin-expressing MSCs Maintenance of long-term repopulating activity and quiescence32
CXCL12 CAR cells, nestin-expressing MSCs, endothelial cells, osteoblastic cells Homing and retention99; maintenance of the HSC pool size21
SCF Endothelial cells, osteoblastic cells, nestin-expressing MSCs Maintenance of long-term repopulating activity118
Notch ligands Endothelial cells, osteoblastic cells Increased expression on osteoblastic cells after parathyroid hormone stimulation is associated with increased HSC numbers in the bone marrow; however, loss of this signalling pathway does not impair HSC function in the steady state119,120
Thrombopoietin Osteoblastic cells Maintenance of long-term repopulating activity and quiescence30,31
WNT ligands Osteoblastic cells Conflicting findings: enhanced self-renewal when used pharmacologically; however, loss of this signalling pathway does not impair HSC function in the steady state121; inhibition by osteoblastic cell-specific expression of DKK1 increased HSC cycling and reduced HSC serial transplant capability29
Factors that affect immune cells
APRIL Granylocytes, lymphocytes, dendritic cells, megakaryocytes Survival of plasma cell precursors61
BAFF Granulocytes, lymphocytes, dendritic cells Survival of plasma cell precursors61
CXCL12 CAR cells, nestin-expressing MSCs, endothelial cells, osteoblastic cells Retention of B lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow22; homing and retention of plasma cell precursors68; homing and retention of HSCs21
IL-6 Endothelial cells, osteoblastic cells, megakaryocytes Survival of plasma cells60; pleiotropic effects on HSCs and myeloid progenitors
IL-7 IL-7-secreting stromal cells Support of early B cell lymphopoiesis; survival of memory T cells54,67
MIF Dendritic cells Survival of plasma cell precursors57

APRIL, a proliferation-inducing ligand; BAFF, B cell activating factor; CAR, CXCL12-abundant reticular; CXCL12, CXC-chemokine ligand 12; DKK1, dickkopf-related protein 1; HSC, haematopoietic stem cell; IL, interleukin; MIF, macrophage inhibitory factor; MSC, mesenchymalstromalcell; SCF, stem cell factor.

Table 2.

How alterations in cellular niche components affect the haematopoietic and immune systems

Niche component Increase or decrease in niche component Experimental model Phenotype Refs
Osteoblastic cells* (identified by activity of the Col1a1 2.3kb promoter) Increase Constitutively active PTH receptor • Increase in HSC numbers 8

Osteoblastic cells* (identified by activity of the Col1a1 2.3kb promoter) Decrease Thymidine kinase suicide gene • Decrease in bone marrow cellularity 51,122
• Extra medullary haematopoiesis
• Loss of pre-pro-B and pro-B cells

Bone marrow stroma (nonspecific) Increase Inducible knockout of Bmpr1a • Increase in HSC numbers 123

Osteoblastic cells* (nonspecific) Decrease Biglycan knockout mouse strain • No change in HSC numbers 124

Osteoprogenitors (osterix-expressing) Decrease Deficiency of Gsα • Impaired B cell lymphopoiesis 125

Osteoclasts (nonspecific) Decrease Pharmacological inhibition (with zoledronic acid or alendronate); M-CSF-deficient mouse; FOS-deficient mouse; RANKL-deficient mouse • Increased trabecular volume 41,42,52
• Decreased HSC numbers
• Decreased engraftment capacity
• Decreased B cell precursor numbers
• Increased HSC mobilization

Macrophages (M-CSFR+) Decrease MAFIA suicide gene or drug treatment (with clodronate) • HSC mobilization to peripheral blood and spleen 44

Macrophages(CD169+) Decrease DTR suicide gene • HSC mobilization to peripheral blood 43

Stromal cells (nestin-expressing) Decrease DTR suicide gene • Decrease in bone marrow HSC numbers 20
• Extra medullary haematopoiesis
• Decrease in the efficiency of HSC homing to the bone marrow

Reticular cells (CXCL12+) Decrease DTR suicide gene • Decrease in bone marrow HSC numbers 22
• Increase in HSC quiescence
• Decrease in numbers of lymphoid progenitors

Adipocytes Decrease A-ZIP/F1 knockout mouse strain or drug treatment (with BADGE) • Increase in trabecular bone 23
• Increase in HSC numbers
• Increased HSC engraftment capacity

Dendritic cells (CD11c+) Decrease DTR suicide gene • Decreased numbers of mature B cells 57

Eosinophils Decrease ΔdblGATA1 knockout mouse model • Impaired long-term maintenance of plasma cells 63

Megakaryocytes Decrease or increase Tpo knockout mouse strain or exogenous administration of TPO • Proportional change in plasma cell numbers 64

BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether; Bmpr1a, bone morphogenic protein receptor 1A; Col1a1, type I collagen α1; CXCL12, CXC-chemokine ligand 12; DTR, diphtheria toxin receptor; HSC, haematopoietic stem cell; MAFIA, macrophage FAS-induced apoptosis; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; M-CSFR, M-CSF receptor; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RANKL, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand; TPO, thrombopoietin.

*

Osteoblastic cells are not synonymous with osteoblasts; these rows represent studies carried out using genetic constructs to evaluate a range of cells in the osteolineage.

It is important to note that niches in higher organisms are unlikely to be created by a single cell type, but are a tissue — that is, a combinatorial interaction of cells, matrix, biophysical forces and metabolic substrate components. Studies that define a contributing cell type should not be interpreted as indicating that this cell type is the niche. In addition, because the haematopoietic and immune systems need to rapidly respond and adapt to the needs of the organism, their niche within the bone marrow should not be viewed as a static entity, but rather as a microenvironment that continually processes and conveys information. These aspects lead to challenges and controversies in understanding how various cell types generate the niche in vivo.

In this Review, we aim to dissect the individual components of the haematopoietic and immune cell niches in the bone marrow, and build on this knowledge to discuss how these elements collaborate to form a functional system. We begin by reviewing the various components of the haematopoietic and immune cell niches. Recent studies focusing on perfusion, oxygenation and innervation highlight how the bone marrow is divided into distinct domains. Against this background, we discuss how HSCs and immune cells respond to particular situations — such as inflammation or the depletion of mature progenitors — by integrating the signals provided by their niche.

Haematopoietic stem cell niches

HSCs arise in a sequential manner during embryonic development. They are first found in extraembryonic tissues and are subsequently present in the aorta–gonad–mesonephros area, then in the fetal liver and spleen, and finally in the bone marrow, which is the major haematopoietic organ in adults4. The HSCs can be enriched from the bone marrow cell pool on the basis of the expression of specific cell-surface markers. One such cell population is characterized as lineage marker-negative SCA1+KIT+CD41CD48CD150+, and these cells are referred to as LSK SLAM cells. One in two cells in this population are functional HSCs, and thus LSK SLAM cells are often used as a representative HSC population in flow cytometry or microscopy studies5. In the steady state, microscopy studies of the bone marrow have identified LSK SLAM cells in the periphery of sinusoids, near endosteal surfaces and in the poorly defined `stroma' that is located between the sinusoids5, suggesting that HSCs can reside in multiple locations (FIG. 1). We describe below the known contributions of different bone marrow cell types to the regulation of HSCs.

Figure 1. Haematopoietic stem cell niches.

Figure 1

In the bone marrow, haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can be found near the endosteal surface (a); in association with CXCL12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells (b); and in the periphery of sinusoids and perivascular nestin-expressing cells (c). Each niche is thought to provide signals that support HSC behaviour, although the relationship between HSCs that are present in different niches is still unclear (dotted arrows). Likewise, blood vessels in the bone marrow are often in close association with bone, although their interaction is still poorly understood (d). At the endosteal surface, osteoblastic cells express factors that participate in HSC retention; osteoclasts regulate osteoblastic cell function by inducing bone remodelling; and macrophages regulate osteoblastic cell activity and the retention of HSCs. In the bone marrow stroma, HSCs are associated with CAR cells, which express factors that promote HSC retention. Adipocytes negatively regulate HSCs in the steady state. In the perivascular area, HSCs are associated with nestin-expressing cells, which promote HSC retention and are regulated by macrophages and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS).

It is important to note that, although most HSCs in adults are present in the bone marrow, this may not be an absolute requirement for their function, as haematopoiesis can also occur in extramedullary sites (for example, in the spleen, liver and lungs)6. The spleen in rodents is a well-defined site where HSCs can function. It is less clear whether the same is true in humans, although under stress conditions some degree of haematopoiesis is observed in the spleen and other sites. Whether extramedullary sites provide comparable regulation, particularly of stem cell quiescence, is debated, but evidence suggests that the bone marrow may be distinct from the spleen in that regard7.

A defining feature of a niche is the ability to regulate the self-renewal of stem cells, but the precise links between HSC self-renewal and location have not yet been well defined. It has been shown that modulating osteoblastic cell function can increase haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) numbers, but whether it does so by direct or indirect action is not clear8. Therefore, our knowledge to date provides a picture of bone marrow niches with only a limited resolution.

Vascular contribution to the niche

Multiple indirect lines of evidence suggest that areas adjacent to blood vessels constitute an HSC niche. First, the generation of HSCs occurs in association with vascular areas and blood flow during embryonic development911. Second, in humans, extramedullary haematopoiesis occurs in perivascular areas in the setting of haematopoietic stress6. Third, HSCs (as defined by their immunophenotype) have been observed in the vicinity of sinusoids5. Last, endothelial cells have been shown to express cell-surface molecules that facilitate the transit of HSCs and immune cells between the bone marrow and the periphery12.

On the basis of in vivo and ex vivo studies, bone marrow endothelial cells were found to express factors that promote haematopoiesis, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macro phage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), stem cell factor (SCF; also known as KIT ligand), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3L; also known as FLK2 ligand)13. In addition, these cells were shown to express the adhesion molecules E-selectin, P-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1)14. The bone marrow vasculature is heterogeneous in its expression of molecules that are thought to facilitate cell homing, such as E-selectin and CXC-chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12). Such homing pathways can also be exploited by malignancies that can metastasize to the bone marrow12,15,16. In vitro, immortalized endothelial cells can support HSC function in culture through the expression of Notch ligands17. Similarly, the expression of a constitutively active mutant form of AKT in endothelial cells (using a cell-specific inducible transgenic mouse model) leads to an increase in HSC numbers18. These characteristics support the idea that endothelial cells can provide niche functions in vivo, although conclusive evidence that they do so is not yet in hand.

Mesenchymal contribution to the niche

Endothelial cells are surrounded by perivascular mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which provide structural support and harbour populations of cells that can regenerate the bone marrow stroma and interact directly with HSCs. A subpopulation of bone marrow adventitial cells that is characterized by the expression of the surface marker CD146 in humans19 or the cytoplasmic filament protein nestin in mice20 can give rise to ectopic haematopoietic microenvironments following transplantation, suggesting that these cells are involved in the regeneration of the bone marrow stroma. These cells wrap around blood vessels and adrenergic nerve fibres, both in the central and endosteal bone marrow regions, and they express several proteins that regulate HSC maintenance, including CXCL12, angiopoietin 1 and SCF. Deletion of nestin-expressing MSCs leads to a 50% reduction in bone marrow HSC numbers and a proportional increase in HSC numbers in the spleen, suggesting that nestin-expressing cells are involved in tethering HSCs in a perivascular location within the bone marrow20.

CXCL12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells are a sub-population of mesenchymal cells that were identified in a genetic mouse model in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) was expressed under the control of the Cxcl12 promoter21. CAR cells are scattered throughout the bone marrow, secrete factors that support haematopoiesis, and are located adjacent to a substantial proportion of immunophenotypically defined HSCs. The deletion of CAR cells in the adult mouse using a suicide-gene strategy leads to a decrease in HSC numbers and an increase in HSC quiescence22. As the aforementioned nestin-expressing MSCs also express high levels of CXCL12, nestin-expressing MSCs might represent a functional subtype of CAR cells that are found in the perivascular location. Distinct functions for the various types of mesenchymal cell populations are in the process of being defined. For example, recent data suggest that more-primitive mesenchymal cells, such as those expressing nestin, are participants in HSC regulation20.

Adipocytes are another stromal component of the bone marrow microenvironment that is thought to regulate HSC function. In mice, the adipocyte-rich tail vertebrae have markedly fewer HSPCs and less cell cycling than the adipocyte-poor thoracic vertebrae23. In a lipoatrophic genetic mouse model, bone marrow transplantation led to accelerated haematopoietic recovery following irradiation compared with recovery times in control mice, although alterations in osteogenesis were also present in this model and a possible confounder of the adipocyte-specific effects23.

Trabecular bone contribution to the niche

The isolation of different fractions of bone marrow cells according to their association with bone has shown that most HSCs are found within trabecular bone25,26. In the bone marrow, the bone-forming osteoblasts secrete multiple haematopoietic cytokines, including G-CSF, M-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1, IL-6, IL-7 and CXCL12 (ref. 27), and express molecules — such as Notch ligands8,28, WNT ligands29, thrombopoietin30,31 and angiopoietin 1 (ref. 32) — that may contribute to the maintenance of HSC function. Osteoblasts also express many types of adhesion molecules that may facilitate HSC–niche interactions; these molecules include VCAM1, ICAM1, annexin II, n-cadherin, CD44 and CD164 (ref. 33). Several, but not all, studies have demonstrated that a change in osteoblast numbers results in corresponding changes in HSC numbers (TABLE 2). Likewise, supraphysiological activation of osteoblastic cells using lineage-specific expression of a constitutively active parathyroid hormone receptor leads to expansion of the HSC pool8. Modification of the function of osteoprogenitors, which are defined by osterix expression, also appears to affect the integrity of haematopoiesis and the cycling of HSCs34. Finally, conditional depletion of osteoblasts markedly compromises G-CSF-mediated mobilization of HSCs from the bone marrow35. Together, these data provide a strong case for the participation of cells of the osteolineage in the HSC niche.

Although osteolineage cells are participants in the niche, it is not true that all cells of the lineage have a role. The data indicate that it is more-primitive osteolineage cells rather than mature osteoblasts that provide niche functions. A study in which Dicer1 was deleted in osteoprogenitors identified alterations in multiple parameters of haematopoiesis, including HSC cycling, whereas the same gene deletion in mature osteoblasts had no such effect34. Others have also found that immature osteolineage cells have a more prominent role36. Therefore, there appears to be a complex and hierarchical organization of niche-modulating functions among different mesenchymal cell types.

The products of osteolineage cells have also been shown to modulate HSC function in vivo. For example, osteoblasts secrete the extracellular matrix protein osteopontin, which regulates HSC numbers and migration to the endosteal surface37,38. Furthermore, osteolineage cells lay down an extracellular matrix that becomes highly mineralized, and this creates a high Ca2+ concentration at the periendosteal surface. HSCs respond to Ca2+ via the calcium-sensing receptor, and this process is required for their engraftment in the bone marrow39.

Osteoblasts are responsible for inducing the maturation of osteoclasts through the production of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), and this molecule may participate in regulating HSCs. Acute activation of osteoclasts following RANKL-mediated stimulation leads to haematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation and mobilization40, whereas the suppression of osteoclast activity by pharmacological methods decreases HSC numbers in the bone marrow41 and increases HSC mobilization42. However, genetic mouse models with altered osteoclast numbers have provided conflicting results regarding the effects on HSC mobilization42,40. These results suggest that osteoclasts may have some role in maintaining the numbers of HSCs in the bone marrow, but their role in mobilization is still in question.

Trabecular and mesenchymal niche components include macrophages, as deletion of these cells in vivo leads to HSC mobilization through a decrease in the expression of HSC retention factors by nestin-expressing cells43 and perhaps by osteoblasts44,45. G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization appears to exert an inhibitory action on macrophages, and this in turn modulates HSC localization through effects on other niche populations4345. Therefore, macrophages are participants in the modulation of HSC localization.

Immune cell niches

Through cell-deletion and microscopy studies, several subsets of bone marrow cells have been shown to support immune cell function. Indeed, in addition to its role as a primary lymphoid organ through the support of lymphoid development, the bone marrow can act as a host for various mature lymphoid cell types.

HSC commitment to lymphopoiesis

Lymphoid development is a highly ordered process that is accompanied by the sequential expression of different growth factor receptors and cell-surface molecules. Deciphering the factors that instruct HSCs to adopt a lymphoid fate and the isolation of cellular intermediates in the process of lymphoid commitment are active areas of research. Several groups have demonstrated heterogeneity in the lymphoid reconstitution potential among HSCs, suggesting that some HSCs possess an intrinsically determined lymphoid bias4648. Whether this bias results from epigenetic changes programmed by interactions with the niche is unknown. The HSC bias is skewed towards myelopoiesis during ageing48,49, but likewise it is unclear whether this is due to the accumulation of genetic changes in HSCs or an alteration in niche elements.

Niches for lymphopoiesis

Early in lymphoid development, multipotent progenitors with T cell potential migrate to the thymus, while progenitors with B cell potential remain in the bone marrow. Signalling through the Notch receptor has been shown to direct lineage specification towards a T cell fate (reviewed in ref. 50), but whether `priming' of early thymic progenitors occurs in the bone marrow before migration to the thymus is still unknown. The bone marrow niches for B cell development are better understood. Through cell-deletion studies and microscopy, the sequential engagement of multiple niches has been shown to contribute to B cell development within the bone marrow. Osteoblasts, osteoclasts and CAR cells are required for the earliest stages of development, whereas IL-7-secreting stromal cells and sinusoidal endothelial cells promote further B cell maturation (FIG. 2a,b,c). Osteoblast ablation using expression of a suicide gene under the control of the type I collagen α1 promoter results in a rapid and dramatic decrease in the numbers of pre-pro-B cells and pro-B cells51. By contrast, inhibition of osteoclast function leads to relocalization of B cell progenitors to the spleen, presumably through a compensatory decrease in osteoblast function52, and this suggests that the endosteal surface is required for the initial steps in B cell lymphopoiesis.

Figure 2. Immune cell niches.

Figure 2

During B cell differentiation, haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and pre-pro-B cells are found in close association with CXCL12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells (a), whereas pro-B cells are more often in contact with interleukin-7 (IL-7)-secreting stromal cells (b). Later in B cell development, a population of immature B cells can be found in close association with endothelial cells (c). Naive B and T cells, which can respond to blood-borne pathogens, are found within a perivascular niche that is constituted by a network of dendritic cells (DCs) (d). Bone marrow-resident memory CD4+ T cells reside next to IL-7-secreting stromal cells and are mostly found in a quiescent state (e). Plasma cells also reside in the bone marrow. CAR cells, eosinophils and megakaryocytes express factors that promote plasma cell engraftment and survival (f).

CAR cells are found in close association with pre-pro-B cells53, and their ablation leads to a decrease in the numbers of common lymphoid progenitors and pro-B cells, suggesting that CXCL12 expression is required for tethering early B cell progenitors in the bone marrow22. The transition from pre-pro-B cells to pro-B cells requires IL-7 signalling54, and IL-7-secreting stromal cells (which do not express CXCL12) are found in proximity to pro-B cells, suggesting that they constitute a distinctive niche53. In addition, as part of their maturation, most B cells migrate to peripheral organs; however, some B cells remain in contact with sinusoidal endothelial cells. This adhesion is mediated in part by VCAM1 and endocannabinoid receptor expression, and it contributes to the diversity of the immunoglobulin repertoire through an unknown mechanism55. Finally, although most newly formed B cells continue their maturation in the spleen at this point, the bone marrow can also support the development of a small proportion of functional mature B cells56. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that B cell lymphopoiesis is dependent on the successful engagement of multiple cellular niches in the bone marrow.

Niches for naive immune cells

The bone marrow perisinusoidal space is populated by clusters of dendritic cells (DCs) that colocalize with naive recirculating B cells and T cells57,58 (FIG. 2d). Deletion of these DCs using a suicide-gene strategy led to a decrease in the number of naive B cells in the bone marrow, as well as a decrease in IgM secretion following immunization, whereas B cell progenitors and T cells were not affected. These DCs are thought to provide naive B cells with specific survival signals, such as macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)57. Interestingly, perisinusoidal naive B cells can be activated by T cell-independent antigens, in a manner similar to that which occurs in the splenic marginal zone. Regarding T cells, the factors required for their maintenance in the bone marrow are less well understood, but perisinusoidal DCs can also cross-present blood-borne antigens to naive T cells58. Collectively, this suggests that immune cells localized in perivascular regions in the bone marrow provide key functions that are important for protection against blood-borne pathogens.

Niches for plasma cells

Following antigen exposure, B cells can home back to the bone marrow, where they persist as antibody-secreting plasma cells59. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that plasma cells depend on survival signals from their microenvironment, and these signals include CXCL12, IL-6, CD44, B cell-activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL)60,61. Plasma cells are found in close proximity to CAR cells53, and mice genetically deficient in CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) show impaired homing of plasmablasts62, demonstrating that the engraftment of plasma cells requires CXCL12 signalling via CXCR4. Two other mature cell types, eosinophils and megakaryocytes, contribute to the plasma cell niche. Eosinophils secrete APRIL, a member of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily, and their depletion leads to a decrease in the numbers of bone marrow plasma cells63. Megakaryocytes also secrete APRIL and IL-6, and mice deficient in megakaryocytes have lower plasma cell numbers64. Interestingly, CAR cells express low levels of APRIL but can recruit eosinophils and megakaryocytes through the secretion of CXCL12 (REFS 65,66). Thus, CAR cells might act as `core organizers' of the plasma cell niche by coordinating the action of multiple cell components (FIG. 2f).

Niches for memory cells

Several studies have found that the bone marrow harbours a substantial population of memory immune cells. In mice, following short-term antigen challenge, the majority of long-lived CD4+ T cells localize to the bone marrow, where they reside in close contact with IL-7-secreting stromal cells67 (FIG. 2e). Furthermore, these cells can be quickly activated following secondary challenge to provide efficient helper functions, qualifying them as bona fide memory CD4+ T cells. The majority of bone marrow CD4+ memory T cells are in the G0 phase of the cell cycle, and interaction with IL-7-secreting stromal cells has been proposed to maintain this quiescence in the absence of antigen receptor signalling67,68. Experiments using adoptive transfer of central memory CD8+ T cells that were differentiated in vitro demonstrated that these cells can also home to the bone marrow and respond to antigen stimulation69. This suggests that the bone marrow has a role in the maintenance of both CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells.

In addition, in a mouse transplantation model, allogeneic HSCs are protected against allorejection by host regulatory T (TReg) cells that reside within the bone marrow; these two cell populations are found in close proximity at the endosteal surface, and deletion of TReg cells leads to allorejection70. This study raises the possibility that TReg cells share the same niche as HSCs and contribute to making this an immune-privileged site.

Niches for myeloid immune cells

The earliest recognizable myeloid precursors are found adjacent to the endosteal surface and small blood vessels71, suggesting that they reside in specific niches. Although these niches are not fully characterized, ablation of CAR cells leads to accelerated myeloid differentiation, suggesting that CAR cells maintain HSPCs in an undifferentiated state22. At baseline, the bone marrow constitutes a reservoir for mature myeloid elements; the release of these myeloid cells into the peripheral blood is mediated by specific ligands. Neutrophils and monocytes express chemokine receptors that antagonistically regulate their egress into the peripheral blood. In the steady state, both cell types express CXCR4, which promotes their retention into the bone marrow through CXCL12-induced signalling. In the setting of inflammation, CXCR2 mediates the release of neutrophils through interaction with CXCL1 and CXCL2 produced by megakaryocytes72,73, whereas CC-chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) mediates the release of monocytes through interaction with CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) produced by CAR cells, nestin-expressing MSCs and endothelial cells74.

Collectively, these studies demonstrate that, in addition to its role as a primary lymphoid organ, the bone marrow has five other functions. First, it supports distinct populations of naive B cells and T cells in a perivascular DC network. Second, it supports antibody-secreting plasma cells. Third, it supports memory immune cells. Fourth, it serves as an immune-privileged site for HSCs. And, fifth, it serves as a reservoir of myeloid immune cells.

Functional organization of the bone marrow

At present, the quest to construct a model of HSC and immune cell niches is quite unidimensional, as it is based on the interpretation of experiments in which a single molecule or a single cell is manipulated, and this interpretation is limited by the lack of an interactive map. Mapping interactions might provide predictive algorithms for how alterations in each component can modulate changes throughout the system. Overcoming this limitation is possible by accumulating information about specific cell types and responses to individual changes. It can also be facilitated by adding another dimension to the model by including factors that inherently integrate inputs from the organism as a whole (such as innervation or vascular perfusion) or factors that influence cell state (such as metabolic substrates, including oxygen). Combining these parameters under different conditions may ultimately permit a less fragmented, more physiological and predictive portrait of bone marrow regulatory niches.

Perfusion

In mice, the systemic infusion of dyes that label cells to an extent proportional to their degree of perfusion allows the measurement of how blood flow relates to cell state (FIG. 3a). Two studies have described the relationship between the extent of perfusion and the presence of HSCs75,76. In both studies, the perfusion dye Hoechst 33342 was injected intravenously and bone marrow cells were harvested shortly thereafter. Although the first study showed that the least-perfused fraction is enriched in HSPCs by 90- to 200-fold compared with the most-perfused fraction, it did not use specific cell-surface markers to clearly define whether stem cells were more abundant in the least-perfused region75. The second study found that half of the HSCs defined by the LSK SLAM markers reside in the least-perfused area, a fraction substantially higher than that of other bone marrow cell types76. These data provide an interesting and suggestive association between HSCs and low perfusion, but it is not clear whether the levels of oxygen or other substrates in these regions are different. Furthermore, it is not clear whether HSCs preferentially localize to low-perfusion zones or whether their primitive cell state is better preserved in that context.

Figure 3. Functional organization of the bone marrow.

Figure 3

The three panels show representative images obtained using techniques that can be applied to study perfusion, oxygenation and innervation of the bone marrow compartment and to highlight its heterogeneity. a | Study of the perfusion state of nucleated cells in the mouse bone marrow. Bone marrow was harvested 10 minutes after intravenous administration of Hoechst 33342 dye and fluorescence intensity was measured by flow cytometry. Different populations are defined according to the percentile of fluorescence intensity and can later be studied by immunophenotype or functional assays. b | Study of the oxygenation state in the mouse bone marrow. Hypoxic regions within femur sections were stained using pimonidazole and imaged 3 hours after intravenous pimonidazole injection. Pimonidazole is identified by a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled pimonidazole-specific monoclonal IgG1 antibody (green), and the nuclei are visualized using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (blue). Images were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy using an X10 objective. The staining is heterogeneous and present both at the endosteal surface and at other locations, but the image is two-dimensional and therefore anatomical relationships are of limited precision. c | Study of the innervation of the mouse bone marrow. Whole-mount staining of the skull bone marrow revealed subendothelial nestin-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells that are innervated by sympathetic fibres. The projection stack (of depth ~100 μm) of fluorescent images shows the distribution of cells that express a nestin–GFP (green fluorescent protein) conjugate (green), as well as that of vascular endothelial cells that express CD31 (also known as PECAM1) (blue) and of sympathetic nerve fibres that express tyrosine hydroxylase (red).

The state of immune cell niches has not yet been studied with perfusion dyes. The observations that naive B and T cells are close to sinusoids does not provide sufficient evidence, as flow in these vascular beds may be slow and not associated with high nutrient and gas exchange. It is therefore unclear whether the localization of immune subsets corresponds to low or high perfusion regions.

Oxygenation

Cell residence in a hypoperfused environment might offer several advantages, including an increased concentration of locally secreted growth factors, protection from systemically distributed toxins and reduced generation of reactive oxygen species77. The hypoxia-specific stain pimonidazole has been perfused to define the oxygenation of haematopoietic cells in vivo78. A substantial proportion of LSK SLAM cells were observed in regions with low levels of oxygen (FIG. 3b). Several studies suggest that hypoxia is a negative regulator of the cell cycle in haematopoietic cells. In vitro, HSCs are better maintained in hypoxic culture conditions, possibly owing to lower cycling rates79,80. In vivo, inducible deletion of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (Hif1a) in HSCs leads to decreased quiescence and a better reconstitution ability in primary recipients, but this potential is exhausted in secondary transplantations owing to cellular senescence78. HIF1α is known to regulate the expression levels of key metabolic enzymes that favour lactic acid fermentation over mitochondrial respiration81. In support of this model, HSCs have a distinct metabolic profile characterized by low mitochondrial activity82. As a result, HSC residence in a hypoxic niche coupled with low mitochondrial activity might serve as a protective mechanism against oxidative damage.

Hypoxia also modulates the expression of soluble mediators and cytokines, as well as that of their receptors. HIF1α activity in haematopoietic progenitors leads to the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)83, a regulator of stem cell function84. Additional pathways — such as those mediated by KIT, Notch 1 and β-catenin — have been associated with HIF1α in other cell types85,86, and it is possible that these pathways are similarly active in HSC maintenance. Finally, niche components are also responsive to hypoxia: endothelial cells and MSCs react by expressing CXCL12, which facilitates the homing of HSCs87; and osteoblasts react by secreting VEGF, which stimulates bone formation and angiogenesis88. Thus, hypoxia might be an important step in the ontogeny of cellular niches within the bone marrow.

Factors other than hypoxia have also been shown to act upstream of HIF1α. In vitro, the cytokines SCF89 and thrombopoietin83 can increase HIF1α levels, possibly through protein stabilization. MEIS1, a crucial transcription factor for stem cell self-renewal, binds to the Hif1a promoter and increases its expression82. Finally, forkhead box O3A (FOXO3A), a regulator of stem cell activity, induces the expression of CBP/p300-interacting transactivator 2 (CITED2), a repressor of HIF1α activity90.

HIF1α activity has been less well studied in the adaptive immune system, but HIF1α has an important role in B cell lymphopoiesis. Ablation of HIF1α in the immune system impairs the transition from pro-B cell to pre-B cell, owing to the downregulation of the glycolytic pathway in highly proliferating late pro-B cells91, and leads to autoantibody production through an unclear mechanism92. It remains to be shown whether HIF1α is induced by a hypoxic niche or by other factors known to affect lymphopoiesis, such as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1)93.

Innervation

The bone marrow is innervated by autonomic and sensory nerves. Within the bone marrow, nerve fibres travel along the same path as the arterial blood supply and interact with perivascular mesenchymal cells and bone-lining osteoblasts and osteoclasts94 (FIG. 3c). MSCs express β2- and β3-adrenergic receptors and mediate HSC egress in response to acute variations in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) tone95. Osteoblasts express only the β2 receptor and regulate their own growth, as well as osteoclast activity, in response to SNS signalling96.

It has long been recognized that acute physiological stress leads to the rapid mobilization of bone marrow haematopoietic progenitors and splenic lymphocytes. In addition, circadian fluctuations in SNS tone correlate with the release of haematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood, as increased SNS tone induces the downregulation of CXCL12 expression by MSCs95. In vivo, nestin-expressing MSCs are closely associated with nerve fibres and with HSCs, making them putative gatekeepers for the SNS-mediated release of progenitors20. The existence of a gap junction signalling pathway in MSCs that leads to coordinated CXCL12 secretion also raises the possibility that SNS-derived signals can rapidly propagate in the bone marrow stroma97. Physiologically, SNS tone variations may have a role in two aspects of progenitor egress. First, the SNS may regulate the release of progenitors during periods of acute stress; and, second, it may be involved in the homeostatic recycling of a small fraction of cellular niches on a daily basis, by inducing the periodic egress of HSCs.

Adrenergic stimulation of the cellular niches has an important role in the clinical use of supraphysiological doses of G-CSF for stem cell mobilization. Mice deficient in ceramide UDP-galactosyltransferase (CGT; also known as UGT8) display aberrant nerve conduction and almost no stem cell mobilization98. This phenotype is replicated in mice treated with the dopaminergic neuro toxin 6-hydroxydopamine and in mice that cannot synthesize noradrenaline owing to a lack of dopamine β-hydroxylase98. Interestingly, this phenotype is rescued by co-administration of G-CSF and clenbuterol, a β2-adrenergic agonist, highlighting the collaboration between these two signals98. The nature of the cooperation between the two signals is still unclear and is an area of ongoing research (reviewed in detail in REF. 99).

In addition, HSCs can respond to sympathetic nervous stimulation in a cell-autonomous manner. Human CD34+CD38 progenitor cells express dopaminergic receptors, and in vitro treatment with agonists for these receptors increases the chemotaxis, proliferation and engraftment capacity of these progenitor cells in vivo100. These effects are only present when cells are pre-treated with the mobilizing cytokine G-CSF, and are abrogated by treatment with a dopamine antagonist. Cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems also respond to adrenergic stimulation101, suggesting that the SNS can modulate the behaviour of both HSCs and immune cells.

The responsiveness of cell niches

HSCs and immune cells need to rapidly adapt to the fluctuating requirements of the organism by generating progenitor cells and effector cells, respectively, while maintaining a reserve of cells for future challenges. In order to do so, these cells need to integrate signals from their environment. In this section, we discuss the various adaptations of the bone marrow microenvironment that allow it to `sense' the numbers of progenitors and respond to particular states of injury and inflammation.

Feedback mechanisms

HSCs have the ability to alternate between quiescence and the cell cycle according to external cues. Indeed, treatment with cytotoxic agents (such as 5-fluorouracil) leads to a depletion of actively cycling cells, and this is followed by the entry of quiescent HSCs into the cell cycle in an effort to restore homeostasis102. How quiescent HSCs `sense' the need to enter the cell cycle is still poorly understood, but this could be mediated by the loss of the inhibitory signals that were provided by the progenitors or by the concomitant injury of the niche and resulting alterations in the extrinsic cues that are detected by HSCs (FIG. 4). A better understanding of the mechanisms involved could yield considerable therapeutic benefit, as chemotherapy, radiation injury and invasion of the niche by malignancies are likely to alter HSC–niche interactions.

Figure 4. Possible mechanisms by which bone marrow niches adapt to changes.

Figure 4

a | The bone marrow cellular pool is divided between different populations of mature and immature cells. We propose here that mature cell types provide negative feedback to limit progenitor numbers through the secretion of negative regulators or by competing with variable efficiency for niche factors. b | Loss of inhibition by the dominant cell type allows the expansion of the progenitor populations. c | Alternatively, extrinsic factors that modify the composition of the niche alter the balance of the different populations.

It is possible that HSCs and their progeny compete for soluble signals or niche occupancy. For example, depletion of DCs using a suicide-gene strategy leads to myeloproliferation associated with increased serum levels of the cytokine FLT3L103; the receptor for FLT3L is present on both haematopoietic progenitors and DCs, and this suggests that mature DCs can regulate the proliferation of progenitors by controlling FLT3L levels. In aged mice, depletion of mature B cells enhances B cell lymphopoiesis104, suggesting that the accumulation of mature B cells during ageing initiates a negative feedback loop. Furthermore, in this study, the recovery of B cell numbers was accelerated after each round of depletion, indicating that HSCs and/or their niche might acquire reinforced programmes for B cell lymphopoiesis in this setting. Collectively, these studies suggest that extrinsic cues — including the relative abundance of other haematopoietic cell types — affect HSC proliferation and differentiation.

The role of niche occupancy and competition between HSCs for the niche remains a controversial area. It is a widely held notion that death or clearance of existing, niche-occupying HSCs is required for transplanted cells to engraft. However, parabiosis experiments suggest that HSCs leave the niche with sufficient frequency to enable a turnover of engrafted cells of approximately 1% over 3 weeks105,106. This calculation is based on the non-physiological context of parabiosis, but it is validated by studies in which HSCs were intermittently infused into non-conditioned hosts107. These data indicate that there is ongoing entry and egress of HSCs to and from the niche. It is not clear whether this is due to an HSC intrinsic `off-rate' from the niche or to remodelling of the niche itself by processing mechanisms, such as bone turnover. However, the occurrence of this bone turn over supports the idea that HSCs are regularly challenged with the necessity of finding a new niche. This process is inherently one in which HSC fitness is tested and selection pressures may be exerted.

It has been observed by many researchers that increasing the number of HSCs infused in an experimental transplant context does not result in a saturation of engraftment. That is, there does not seem to be a point at which there is no longer additional engraftment, although the slope of the line reflecting the number of cells engrafted compared with the number infused may flatten. These intriguing observations have suggested that HSCs may have some capacity to induce their own niche, a phenomenon observed in other model systems108. The notion that HSCs are not simply passive occupants of a preformed niche but participants in the construction of their own home is an appealing means of potentially explaining how extramedullary haemato poiesis can be established. This idea might also account for why leukaemic cells that are dependent on the bone marrow may have an expanded niche.

Effects of inflammation on cell niches

Information on tissue injury and infection is transmitted to the bone marrow through the systemic release of pro-inflammatory mediators. Within the bone marrow, the overall response to inflammation is geared towards the generation and egress of effector cells, although the type of response can vary according to the nature of the insult109. In a mouse model of mycobacterial infection, increased levels of interferon-γ (IFNγ) in the bone marrow lead to increased cycling and mobilization of HSPCs, and these features are accompanied by a decreased repopulation capacity in secondary recipients110. HSPCs possess a functional IFNγ response pathway, and thus can respond directly to pro-inflammatory signals. Likewise, HSPCs have been shown to proliferate in response to IFNα in a cell-autonomous manner111.

The bone marrow microenvironment also has the ability to respond to injury and infection. G-CSF, which is secreted in the context of inflammation, disrupts an important retention signal in the bone marrow: the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis112. G-CSF also induces the expression of thymopoietin in the bone marrow, and this leads to the secretion of CXCR2 ligands by megakaryocytes, resulting in the mobilization of neutrophils73. In addition, stimulation of Toll-like receptors on CAR cells, nestin-expressing MSCs and endothelial cells by microbial molecules leads to the secretion of CCL2, which induces the egress of monocytes into the peripheral blood113.

Additional data on the topic have been obtained mostly through in vitro studies that must be interpreted with caution. Ex vivo-purified MSCs have the ability to either suppress or stimulate immune responses. Once exposed to pro-inflammatory cytokines, MSCs can suppress lymphocyte proliferation through direct cell contact and secreted mediators114. In addition, ex vivo stimulation of MSCs with IFNγ can allow these cells to present soluble antigens to effector T cells by upregulating the expression of MHC class I and MHC class II molecules115. However, whether these phenomena occur in vivo remains to be demonstrated. Endothelial cells can also respond to pro-inflammatory signals by modulating haemostasis, cell adhesion and vascular permeability116. Nevertheless, it is still unclear which signalling pathways are induced by inflammation in bone marrow endothelial cells, and whether they specifically modulate HSC or immune cell behaviour in this context. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that the bone marrow stroma has a multi-faceted response to inflammation that modulates HSC and immune cell behaviour.

Perspectives

The ability to rationally manipulate the haematopoietic and immune systems therapeutically requires insight into the dialogue between haematopoietic cells and their niches. Several questions remain unanswered. What are the minimal requirements for HSC self-renewal? In which cellular compartment(s) does this self-renewal mainly occur? Do HSCs compete for the niche in a classical sense, whereby cell death is imposed on `loser' cells? How do niches form and regenerate, are they generated in response to haematopoietic cells themselves and what determines the number of niches? How do memory immune cells compete for space within their niches? As experimentally induced niche dysfunction can pre-dispose an animal to myeloproliferative disease24,117 or myelodysplasia and cancer34, are human haematological or immune diseases caused by acquired niche abnormalities? Are malignancies that localize to the bone marrow dependent on niche signals, and do those signals affect tumour responses to chemotherapy? Do HSCs compete with leukaemic cells for the same niche? Answers to these questions have clinical potential, as intervening at the interfaces of cells may be possible using biological or small-molecule drugs, thereby providing new therapeutic opportunities for stem cell transplantation, immune-mediated diseases and cancer (BOX 1).

Box 1 | The therapeutic potential of niche modulations

  • Enhancement of the haematological and immunological recovery following chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation

  • Reversal of the age-associated decline in lymphopoiesis

  • Enhancement of the chemotherapy-mediated killing of residual malignant cells

  • Enhancement of immunological memory, or of the depletion of autoreactive immune memory cells

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank D. B. Sykes, L. Silberstein and I. Droujinine for their comments on the manuscript. Thanks also go to J.-P. Lévesque and S. Méndez-Ferrer for generously contributing to FIG. 3. F.E.M. is a recipient of a Clinician Scientist Training Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. C.R. was funded by Massachusetts General Hospital institutional funds. This work was supported by the Ellison Medical Foundation and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grants U01HL10042 and R01HL44851).

Glossary

Quiescence

A phase in the cell cycle in which the cell is not dividing or preparing to divide but still has the ability to do so in the presence of an appropriate signal.

Sinusoids

Specialized blood vessels that are similar to capillaries, but are lined by endothelial cells with fenestrations that allow the passage of cells and large molecules.

Adventitial cells

Connective tissue cells that surround small blood vessels and have a supportive structural role and possibly other functions, such as blood flow regulation.

Trabecular bone

A network of bony projections that is present at the ends of long bones and forms a highly vascularized, porous matrix that is the main site of haematopoiesis in adults.

Osterix

(Also known as SP7). A zinc finger-containing transcription factor that is required for the commitment of mesenchymal cells to the osteoblastic lineage.

Dicer1

This gene encodes Dicer, an endoribonuclease that cleaves double-stranded RNA and is important for processing pre-microRNAs.

Epigenetic changes

Modifications in the activation state of certain genes that persist following cell division. These alterations are not related to changes in DNA sequence, but are induced through other mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications.

T cell-independent antigens

Antigens that do not require T cell help to induce specific antibody production. These antigens are commonly polymeric antigens, such as polysaccharides and lipids.

Splenic marginal zone

An area in the spleen with the major function of trapping circulating antigens. The marginal zone is populated by a distinct population of lymphocytes that can be readily activated following exposure to blood-borne pathogens.

CD34+CD38 progenitor cells

A population of cells within the human haematopoietic system that is defined by the expression of cell-surface markers and is enriched in stem cells and progenitors.

Footnotes

Competing interests statement The authors declare competing financial interests: see Web version for details.

References

  • 1.Scadden DT. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature. 2006;441:1075–1079. doi: 10.1038/nature04957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells. 1978;4:7–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones DL, Wagers AJ. No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:11–21. doi: 10.1038/nrm2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dzierzak E, Speck NA. Of lineage and legacy: the development of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells. Nature Immunol. 2008;9:129–136. doi: 10.1038/ni1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 2005;121:1109–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article showed that markers of the SLAM family are a useful tool that can be used to enrich for HSCs and progenitor cells. Using these markers, the authors showed that HSCs are present close to the sinusoidal endothelium in the bone marrow and the spleen. However, it was not determined whether this location represented a site of functional support of the cells (a niche) or a point of accumulation as the cells trafficked into and out of the bone marrow.
  • 6.O'Malley DP. Benign extramedullary myeloid proliferations. Mod. Pathol. 2007;20:405–415. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morita Y, et al. Functional characterization of hematopoietic stem cells in the spleen. Exp. Hematol. 2011;39:351–359. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calvi LM, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated that HSC numbers could be affected by genetic modulation of a specific set of osteolineage cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. It was the first demonstration of a specific cell type participating in a mammalian stem cell niche.
  • 9.North TE, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell. 2009;137:736–748. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adamo L, et al. Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature. 2009;459:1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature08073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lancrin C, et al. Blood cell generation from the hemangioblast. J. Mol. Med. 2010;88:167–172. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0554-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sipkins DA, et al. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature. 2005;435:969–973. doi: 10.1038/nature03703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using in vivo confocal imaging, the authors identified specialized vascular microdomains within the bone marrow that contribute to HSPC and tumour cell engraftment.
  • 13.Rafii S, Mohle R, Shapiro F, Frey BM, Moore MA. Regulation of hematopoiesis by microvascular endothelium. Leuk. Lymphoma. 1997;27:375–386. doi: 10.3109/10428199709058305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mazo IB, et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. J. Exp. Med. 1998;188:465–474. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kopp HG, Hooper AT, Avecilla ST, Rafii S. Functional heterogeneity of the bone marrow vascular niche. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2009;1176:47–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ellis SL, et al. The relationship between bone, hemopoietic stem cells, and vasculature. Blood. 2011;118:1516–1524. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Butler JM, et al. Endothelial cells are essential for the self-renewal and repopulation of Notch-dependent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kobayashi H, et al. Angiocrine factors from Akt-activated endothelial cells balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature Cell Biol. 2010;12:1046–1056. doi: 10.1038/ncb2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sacchetti B, et al. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell. 2007;131:324–336. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mendez-Ferrer S, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466:829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors described nestin-expressing MSCs that reside exclusively in perivascular regions, are in close spatial relationship with HSCs and alter HSC function. They showed that HSCs and nestin-expressing MSCs constitute a bone marrow niche that can be regulated by hormones and the SNS.
  • 21.Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity. 2006;25:977–988. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Omatsu Y, et al. The essential functions of adipoosteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity. 2010;33:387–399. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Naveiras O, et al. Bone-marrow adipocytes as negative regulators of the haematopoietic microenvironment. Nature. 2009;460:259–263. doi: 10.1038/nature08099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walkley CR, et al. A microenvironment-induced myeloproliferative syndrome caused by retinoic acid receptor γ deficiency. Cell. 2007;129:1097–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grassinger J, Haylock DN, Williams B, Olsen GH, Nilsson SK. Phenotypically identical hemopoietic stem cells isolated from different regions of bone marrow have different biologic potential. Blood. 2010;116:3185–3196. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-260703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lord BI, Hendry JH. The distribution of haemopoietic colony-forming units in the mouse femur, and its modification by X rays. Br. J. Radiol. 1972;45:110–115. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-45-530-110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Taichman RS. Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood. 2005;105:2631–2639. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stier S, Cheng T, Dombkowski D, Carlesso N, Scadden DT. Notch1 activation increases hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in vivo and favors lymphoid over myeloid lineage outcome. Blood. 2002;99:2369–2378. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.7.2369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fleming HE, et al. Wnt signaling in the niche enforces hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and is necessary to preserve self-renewal in vivo. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yoshihara H, et al. Thrombopoietin/MPL signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and interaction with the osteoblastic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:685–697. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qian H, et al. Critical role of thrombopoietin in maintaining adult quiescent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:671–684. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arai F, et al. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell. 2004;118:149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jung Y, et al. Annexin II expressed by osteoblasts and endothelial cells regulates stem cell adhesion, homing, and engraftment following transplantation. Blood. 2007;110:82–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Raaijmakers MH, et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature. 2010;464:852–857. doi: 10.1038/nature08851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that deletion of the gene encoding the microRNA-processing enzyme Dicer in osteoprogenitor cells (but not in mature osteoblasts) induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia in mice. These data revealed that primary changes in a tissue microenvironment can induce malignant transformation, supporting a concept of niche-induced oncogenesis. Broadly, the results indicate that specific mesenchymal cell populations are important in maintaining the integrity of parenchymal cell populations in some tissues.
  • 35.Ferraro F, et al. Diabetes impairs hematopoietic stem cell mobilization by altering niche function. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011;3:104ra101. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jacome-Galarza CE, Lee SK, Lorenzo JA, Aguila HL. Parathyroid hormone regulates the distribution and osteoclastogenic potential of hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:1207–1216. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stier S, et al. Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1781–1791. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nilsson SK, et al. Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 2005;106:1232–1239. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Adams GB, et al. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor. Nature. 2006;439:599–603. doi: 10.1038/nature04247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kollet O, et al. Osteoclasts degrade endosteal components and promote mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Nature Med. 2006;12:657–664. doi: 10.1038/nm1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lymperi S, Ersek A, Ferraro F, Dazzi F, Horwood NJ. Inhibition of osteoclast function reduces hematopoietic stem cell numbers in vivo. Blood. 2011;117:1540–1549. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-282855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Miyamoto K, et al. Osteoclasts are dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and mobilization. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:2175–2181. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chow A, et al. Bone marrow CD169+ macrophages promote the retention of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the mesenchymal stem cell niche. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:261–271. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Winkler IG, et al. Bone marrow macrophages maintain hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches and their depletion mobilizes HSCs. Blood. 2010;116:4815–4828. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Christopher MJ, Rao M, Liu F, Woloszynek JR, Link DC. Expression of the G-CSF receptor in monocytic cells is sufficient to mediate hematopoietic progenitor mobilization by G-CSF in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:251–260. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Morita Y, Ema H, Nakauchi H. Heterogeneity and hierarchy within the most primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:1173–1182. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors transplanted single HSCs that had been selected on the basis of their levels of CD150 surface expression. They demonstrated that CD150hi HSCs provide enhanced myeloid reconstitution compared with CD150-HSCs, which are biased towards lymphoid reconstitution following transplantation. This article provided further support for evidence provided by multiple prior studies that heterogeneous populations of HSCs exist in the bone marrow.
  • 47.Dykstra B, et al. Long-term propagation of distinct hematopoietic differentiation programs in vivo. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Challen GA, Boles NC, Chambers SM, Goodell MA. Distinct hematopoietic stem cell subtypes are differentially regulated by TGF-β1. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beerman I, et al. Functionally distinct hematopoietic stem cells modulate hematopoietic lineage potential during aging by a mechanism of clonal expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:5465–5470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000834107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Weber JM, Calvi LM. Notch signaling and the bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell niche. Bone. 2010;46:281–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhu J, et al. Osteoblasts support B-lymphocyte commitment and differentiation from hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2007;109:3706–3712. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-041384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mansour A, et al. Osteoclast activity modulates B-cell development in the bone marrow. Cell Res. 2011;21:1102–1115. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tokoyoda K, Egawa T, Sugiyama T, Choi BI, Nagasawa T. Cellular niches controlling B lymphocyte behavior within bone marrow during development. Immunity. 2004;20:707–718. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peschon JJ, et al. Early lymphocyte expansion is severely impaired in interleukin 7 receptor-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 1994;180:1955–1960. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.5.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pereira JP, An J, Xu Y, Huang Y, Cyster JG. Cannabinoid receptor 2 mediates the retention of immature B cells in bone marrow sinusoids. Nature Immunol. 2009;10:403–411. doi: 10.1038/ni.1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cariappa A, Chase C, Liu H, Russell P, Pillai S. Naive recirculating B cells mature simultaneously in the spleen and bone marrow. Blood. 2007;109:2339–2345. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sapoznikov A, et al. Perivascular clusters of dendritic cells provide critical survival signals to B cells in bone marrow niches. Nature Immunol. 2008;9:388–395. doi: 10.1038/ni1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that conditional deletion of DCs induces a profound reduction in B cell numbers in the bone marrow. This reduction was specific to recirculating mature B cells, as B cell development was unaffected by DC ablation. The authors showed that DCs, by producing MIF in the perivascular bone marrow niches, promote the survival of recirculating B cells.
  • 58.Feuerer M, et al. Bone marrow as a priming site for T-cell responses to blood-borne antigen. Nature Med. 2003;9:1151–1157. doi: 10.1038/nm914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Benner R, Meima F, van der Meulen GM, van Muiswinkel WB. Antibody formation in mouse bone marrow. I. Evidence for the development of plaque-forming cells in situ. Immunology. 1974;26:247–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cassese G, et al. Plasma cell survival is mediated by synergistic effects of cytokines and adhesion-dependent signals. J. Immunol. 2003;171:1684–1690. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Benson MJ, et al. Cutting edge: the dependence of plasma cells and independence of memory B cells on BAFF and APRIL. J. Immunol. 2008;180:3655–3659. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nie Y, et al. The role of CXCR4 in maintaining peripheral B cell compartments and humoral immunity. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:1145–1156. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chu VT, et al. Eosinophils are required for the maintenance of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nature Immunol. 2011;12:151–159. doi: 10.1038/ni.1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Winter O, et al. Megakaryocytes constitute a functional component of a plasma cell niche in the bone marrow. Blood. 2010;116:1867–1875. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-259457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ma Q, Jones D, Springer TA. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is required for the retention of B lineage and granulocytic precursors within the bone marrow microenvironment. Immunity. 1999;10:463–471. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hattori K, Heissig B, Rafii S. The regulation of hematopoietic stem cell and progenitor mobilization by chemokine SDF-1. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2003;44:575–582. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000037985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tokoyoda K, et al. Professional memory CD4+ T lymphocytes preferentially reside and rest in the bone marrow. Immunity. 2009;30:721–730. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tokoyoda K, Hauser AE, Nakayama T, Radbruch A. Organization of immunological memory by bone marrow stroma. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:193–200. doi: 10.1038/nri2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mazo IB, et al. Bone marrow is a major reservoir and site of recruitment for central memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2005;22:259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fujisaki J, et al. In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature. 2011;474:216–219. doi: 10.1038/nature10160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that particular periendosteal regions in the bone marrow are enriched for regulatory T cells that provide an immune-privileged site for HSCs.
  • 71.Wilkins BS. Histology of normal haemopoiesis: bone marrow histology I. J. Clin. Pathol. 1992;45:645–649. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.8.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Eash KJ, Greenbaum AM, Gopalan PK, Link DC. CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murine bone marrow. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:2423–2431. doi: 10.1172/JCI41649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kohler A, et al. G-CSF-mediated thrombopoietin release triggers neutrophil motility and mobilization from bone marrow via induction of Cxcr2 ligands. Blood. 2011;117:4349–4357. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-308387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Y, et al. CCR2 and CXCR4 regulate peripheral blood monocyte pharmacodynamics and link to efficacy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Inflamm. 2009;6:32. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-6-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Parmar K, Mauch P, Vergilio JA, Sackstein R, Down JD. Distribution of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow according to regional hypoxia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:5431–5436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701152104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Winkler IG, et al. Positioning of bone marrow hematopoietic and stromal cells relative to blood flow in vivo: serially reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells reside in distinct nonperfused niches. Blood. 2010;116:375–385. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-233437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using a Hoechst dye to measure perfusion, the authors showed that HSCs that reside in hypoperfused areas display better reconstitution ability in serial transplantation assays.
  • 77.Eliasson P, Jonsson JI. The hematopoietic stem cell niche: low in oxygen but a nice place to be. J. Cell Physiol. 2009;222:17–22. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Takubo K, et al. Regulation of the HIF-1α level is essential for hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that HIF1α is important for HSC numbers and quiescence.
  • 79.Cipolleschi MG, Dello Sbarba P, Olivotto M. The role of hypoxia in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 1993;82:2031–2037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Eliasson P, et al. Hypoxia mediates low cell-cycle activity and increases the proportion of long-term-reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells during in vitro culture. Exp. Hematol. 2010;38:301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wheaton WW, Chandel NS. Hypoxia. 2. Hypoxia regulates cellular metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C385–C393. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00485.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Simsek T, et al. The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:380–390. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kirito K, Fox N, Komatsu N, Kaushansky K. Thrombopoietin enhances expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in primitive hematopoietic cells through induction of HIF-1α. Blood. 2005;105:4258–4263. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gerber HP, et al. VEGF regulates haematopoietic stem cell survival by an internal autocrine loop mechanism. Nature. 2002;417:954–958. doi: 10.1038/nature00821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jogi A, et al. Hypoxia alters gene expression in human neuroblastoma cells toward an immature and neural crest-like phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:7021–7026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102660199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mazumdar J, et al. O2 regulates stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin signalling. Nature Cell Biol. 2010;12:1007–1013. doi: 10.1038/ncb2102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ceradini DJ, et al. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nature Med. 2004;10:858–864. doi: 10.1038/nm1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang Y, et al. The hypoxia-inducible factor α pathway couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis during skeletal development. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:1616–1626. doi: 10.1172/JCI31581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pedersen M, et al. Stem cell factor induces HIF-1α at normoxia in hematopoietic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;377:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bakker WJ, Harris IS, Mak TW. FOXO3a is activated in response to hypoxic stress and inhibits HIF1-induced apoptosis via regulation of CITED2. Mol. Cell. 2007;28:941–953. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kojima H, et al. Differentiation stage-specific requirement in hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-regulated glycolytic pathway during murine B cell development in bone marrow. J. Immunol. 2009;184:154–163. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kojima H, et al. Abnormal B lymphocyte development and autoimmunity in hypoxia-inducible factor 1α-deficient chimeric mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:2170–2174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052706699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Fukuda R, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor expression, which is dependent on MAP kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in colon cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:38205–38211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203781200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mignini F, Streccioni V, Amenta F. Autonomic innervation of immune organs and neuroimmune modulation. Auton. Autacoid Pharmacol. 2003;23:1–25. doi: 10.1046/j.1474-8673.2003.00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mendez-Ferrer S, Lucas D, Battista M, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by circadian oscillations. Nature. 2008;452:442–447. doi: 10.1038/nature06685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that the release of HSCs into the bloodstream correlates with circadian fluctuations in noradrenaline secretion.
  • 96.Elefteriou F, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434:514–520. doi: 10.1038/nature03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Schajnovitz A, et al. CXCL12 secretion by bone marrow stromal cells is dependent on cell contact and mediated by connexin-43 and connexin-45 gap junctions. Nature Immunol. 2011;12:391–398. doi: 10.1038/ni.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Katayama Y, et al. Signals from the sympathetic nervous system regulate hematopoietic stem cell egress from bone marrow. Cell. 2006;124:407–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lapid K, Vagima Y, Kollet O, Lapidot T. Egress and mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. StemBook. 2009 [online], http://www.stembook.org/node/558. [PubMed]
  • 100.Spiegel A, et al. Catecholaminergic neurotransmitters regulate migration and repopulation of immature human CD34+ cells through Wnt signaling. Nature Immunol. 2007;8:1123–1131. doi: 10.1038/ni1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nance DM, Sanders VM. Autonomic innervation and regulation of the immune system (1987–2007) Brain Behav. Immun. 2007;21:736–745. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Harrison DE, Lerner CP. Most primitive hematopoietic stem cells are stimulated to cycle rapidly after treatment with 5-fluorouracil. Blood. 1991;78:1237–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Birnberg T, et al. Lack of conventional dendritic cells is compatible with normal development and T cell homeostasis, but causes myeloid proliferative syndrome. Immunity. 2008;29:986–997. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Keren Z, et al. B-cell depletion reactivates B lymphopoiesis in the BM and rejuvenates the B lineage in aging. Blood. 2011;117:3104–3112. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors showed that the depletion of B cells in aged mice is followed by expansion of multipotent primitive progenitor and common lymphoid progenitor populations, suggesting the presence of a feedback mechanism.
  • 105.Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP, Johnson FL, Weissman IL. Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science. 2001;294:1933–1936. doi: 10.1126/science.1064081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Abkowitz JL, Robinson AE, Kale S, Long MW, Chen J. Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells during homeostasis and after cytokine exposure. Blood. 2003;102:1249–1253. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bhattacharya D, et al. Niche recycling through division-independent egress of hematopoietic stem cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:2837–2850. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sato T, et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature. 2011;469:415–418. doi: 10.1038/nature09637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Baldridge MT, King KY, Goodell MA. Inflammatory signals regulate hematopoietic stem cells. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors used an in vivo mouse model of mycobacterial infection to demonstrate that HSPCs are responsive to systemic infection, as they proliferate in response to IFNγ signalling.
  • 110.Baldridge MT, King KY, Boles NC, Weksberg DC, Goodell MA. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-γ in response to chronic infection. Nature. 2010;465:793–797. doi: 10.1038/nature09135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Essers MA, et al. IFNα activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2009;458:904–908. doi: 10.1038/nature07815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Greenbaum AM, Link DC. Mechanisms of G-CSF-mediated hematopoietic stem and progenitor mobilization. Leukemia. 2010;25:211–217. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Shi C, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells induce monocyte emigration in response to circulating Toll-like receptor ligands. Immunity. 2011;34:590–601. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Singer NG, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2011;6:457–478. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Francois M, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells cross-present soluble exogenous antigens as part of their antigen-presenting cell properties. Blood. 2009;114:2632–2638. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-207795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pober JS, Sessa WC. Evolving functions of endothelial cells in inflammation. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:803–815. doi: 10.1038/nri2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Walkley CR, Shea JM, Sims NA, Purton LE, Orkin SH. Rb regulates interactions between hematopoietic stem cells and their bone marrow microenvironment. Cell. 2007;129:1081–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.McCarthy KF, Ledney GD, Mitchell R. A deficiency of hematopoietic stem cells in steel mice. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1977;10:121–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1977.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Varnum-Finney B, et al. Notch2 governs the rate of generation of mouse long- and short-term repopulating stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1207–1216. doi: 10.1172/JCI43868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Maillard I, et al. Canonical Notch signaling is dispensable for the maintenance of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cobas M, et al. β-catenin is dispensable for hematopoiesis and lymphopoiesis. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199:221–229. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Visnjic D, et al. Hematopoiesis is severely altered in mice with an induced osteoblast deficiency. Blood. 2004;103:3258–3264. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-4011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zhang J, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425:836–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kiel MJ, Radice GL, Morrison SJ. Lack of evidence that hematopoietic stem cells depend on N-cadherin-mediated adhesion to osteoblasts for their maintenance. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:204–217. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wu JY, et al. Osteoblastic regulation of B lymphopoiesis is mediated by Gsα-dependent signaling pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:16976–16981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802898105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES