Table 2.
Summary of reported use of flumazenil in the treatment of long term withdrawal symptoms and management of acute withdrawal
Author | Design | Treatment | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Lader & Morton 1992 [45] | Pilot study n = 11 | 1–2 mg bolus doses over 3 h | Flumazenil successful in alleviating long term symptoms of benzodiazepine withdrawal |
Saxon et al 1997 [46] | Double-blind pilot n = 10 | 1.0 mg total in five doses over 1 h × 2 | Flumazenil successful in alleviating long term symptoms of benzodiazepine withdrawal |
Gerra et al 2002 [47] | RCT flumazenil vs. oxazepam taper n = 50 | 1 mg 4 h−1 infusion twice daily for 8 days with oxazepam taper | Flumazenil group had significantly reduced withdrawal symptoms, improved programme completion and reduced relapse rates |
Hood et al. 2009 [50] | Case series/open trial n = 16 | 2 mg 24 h–1 continuous i.v. infusion with oxazepam. tapering for 4 days | Patients had reduced withdrawal symptoms; successfully completed withdrawal. I.v. infusion problematic |
Quaglio et al 2012 [48] | Case series n = 29 | 1.35 mg day−1 continuous i.v. infusion with clonazepam for 7 days | All patients completed the withdrawal programme with 51% abstinent at 6 months |
Hulse et al 2012 [51] | Case series n = 23 | 4 mg 24 h–1 continuous s.c. infusion with oxazepam taper for 4 days | Subjective withdrawal symptoms well managed. High patient acceptance. Improvement on measures of psychological distress over withdrawal period |
Note: Table includes peer reviewed published data – Lugoboni et al. (2011) [49] not included.