Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 15;7(4):1667–1676.

Table 2.

Massively parallel pyrosequencing of TET2, CBL and KRAS in fresh mononuclear cell samples and decalcified, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow trephine biopsies from four CMML patients

Fresh mononuclear cell sample dFFPE bone marrow trephine biopsy

Sequence variation Allele frequency (%) Reads Sanger Allele frequency (%) Reads Sanger
Case 1 TET2 p.Q916X 42.92 890 pos. 45.9 1011 pos.
TET2 p.I1762V 50.84 2026 pos. 49.13 2019 pos.
TET2 p.I1873T 42.97 1145 pos. 43.48 1334 pos.
TET2 p.I1873MfsX14 6.2 1145 neg. 6.6 1334 neg.
Case 2 CBL p.L380P 30.5 2279 pos. 31.6 883 pos.
TET2 p.Y1255LfsX13 49.1 1564 pos. 37.23 462 pos.
TET2 p.L1816X 46.5 1688 pos. 41.9 432 pos.
Case 3 CBL p.L380P 51.91 836 pos. 45.71 862 pos.
TET2 p.G355D 50.68 876 pos. 50.52 1348 pos.
TET2 p.D527EfsX6 12.78 1221 neg. 11.37 1381 neg.
TET2 p.D527EfsX6 27.17 530 pos. 30.8 685 pos.
TET2 p.H1380Y 50.59 597 pos. 42.23 753 pos.
TET2 p.I1762V 48.84 1116 pos. 43.86 1058 pos.
Case 4 TET2 p.N752KfsX59 34.59 743 pos. 38.51 1688 pos.
TET2 p.D1704EfsX9 5.19 752 neg. 4.19 1741 neg.
TET2 p.I1762V 48.94 1561 pos. 51.3 3302 pos.