Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):788–799. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0529-x

Table 1.

Relationship between adopter characteristics, individual perceptions of intra-organizational characteristics and adherence

Predictor Variable ( N = 109) Mean (SD) b β

Demographics

Experience (months) 65.14 (82.55) −.006 −.304*

Age 35.95 (11.44) .015 .110

EBPAS

EBPAS appeal 3.34 (.62) .393 .157
EBPAS divergence^ .89 (.53) −.078 −.027
EBPAS openness 3.15 (.58) .203 .076
EBPAS requirement 2.75 (1.01) −.465 −.302**

CDAQ

CDAQ opinion 5.98 (1.07) .235 .162
CDAQ confidence 5.42 (1.49) −.031 −.029
CDAQ motivation 6.56 (.76) −.369 −.181
CDAQ usefulness 6.63 (.62) −.025 −.010

ORC

Motivation for Change 33.31 (5.51) −.007 −.024
Resources 33.62 (4.83) −.018 −.057
Staff Attributes 36.18 (3.69) −.101 −.240
Organizational Climate 33.33 (3.11) .129 .259*
Training Climate 23.70 (6.19) .050 .197

Note. EBPAS = Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (Aarons, 2004); CDAQ = Clinician Demographics and Attitudes Questionnaire (Beidas et al., 2009); ORC = Organizational Readiness for Change (Lehman et al., 2002). Note that higher scores on the EBPAS reflect more highly rated appeal, divergence, openness and requirements (range 0–4). Higher scores on the CDAQ reflect more positive opinions, confidence, motivation to learn, and belief in the utility of cognitive-behavioral therapy for child anxiety (range 1–7). Higher scores on the ORC reflect more highly rated motivation for change, resources, staff attributes, organizational climate, and training climate (range 10–50).

^

The mean of the divergence subcale is reverse scored.

*

≤ .05,

**

≤.01,

***

≤ .001. Note these analyses control for baseline skill and adherence.