Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Water Resour. 2014 Jan 1;63:120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.11.005

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Modeled and predicted E coli 4-log10 removal distance representing the maximum transport distance on day 3 after the start of artificial pond filling. (a) 4-log10 removal distance as a function of hydraulic anisotropy. The long-dashed line represents the fitted 4-log10 E. coli removal distance based on the optimal anisotropy of 4. (b) Comparison of 4-log10 E. coli removal distances between 2-D model (2 attachment mode) fitted to E. coli concentrations from the field and predictions made from substituting kinetic parameters derived from 2 population (best fit) 1-D column experiments into the calibrated 2-D flow model. The shaded areas represent the estimated uncertainty in each method. The uncertainty band for the 2-D model was obtained by substituting the range of possible values of ka, kd and ki into the model (Table 2).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure