Table 4.
Ref. | Line of treatment | Regimen | No. | ORR (%) | CBR (%) | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) |
O’Shaughnessy et al[40] | First line | Gemcitabine + | 61 | 52 | 56 | 5.9 | 12 |
Carboplatin ± | 62 | 32 | 34 | 3.6 | 7.7 | ||
Inipari2 | |||||||
Isakoff et al[42] | First line | Veliparib2 + TMZO | 41 | 37.5 | 62.5 | 5.5 | NR |
Carey et al[44] | First line | Cetuxim12 ± | 71 | 18 | 31 | 22 | 12 |
Carboplatin1 | 54 | 6 | 10 | ||||
O’Shaughnessy et al[45] | First or second line | Irinotecan + | 52 | 49 | NR | 5.1 | 15.5 |
Carboplatin ± | |||||||
Cetuxim12 | 51 | 30 | 4.7 | 12.3 | |||
Finn et al[49] | First line | Dasatini2 | 44 | 4.6 | 9.2 | 8.3 wk | NR |
Baselga et al[46] | First or second line | Cisplatin ± | 115 | 20 | NR | 3.73 | 12.9 |
Cetuxim12 | 58 | 10 | 1.5 | 9.4 | |||
Gray et al[50] | First line | Paclitaxel ± | 122 | 48 | NR | 11.83 | NR |
(E2100) | Bevacizum12 | 111 | 22 | 5.9 | |||
Miles et al[51] | First line | Docetaxel ± | 58 | 64 | NR | 103 | NR |
(AVADO) | Bevacizum12 | 53 | 46 | 8 | |||
Robert et al[52] | First line | Tax/Anthr1 | 96 | NR | NR | 6.5 | NR |
(RiBBON-1) | ± Bevacizum12 | 46 | 6.2 | ||||
Cap ± | 87 | NR | NR | 6.13 | NR | ||
Bevacizum12 | 50 | 4.2 | |||||
Brufsky et al[53] | Second line | Cap, tax, gem/vinorel, ± | 112 | 413 | NR | 6.03 | 17.9 |
(RiBBON-2) | Bevacizum12 | 47 | 18 | 2.7 | 12.6 |
Cross over to cetuximab + carboplatin arm after progressive disease;
For entire cohort;
Significant. TMZO: Temozolamide; ORR: Overall response rate; CBR: Clinical benefit rate; PFS: Progression free survival; NR: Not reported; Tax: Taxanes; Cap: Capecitabine; Gem: gemcitabine.