Table 1.
Strategy | Tuning | P0 | MAP |
---|---|---|---|
Impact of the description field | Description | 2.20% | 1.34% |
No description | 2.87% | 1.52% | |
Impact of the metadata field | No metadata | 3.64% | 1.93% |
Metadata on TAC | 3.63% | 1.92% | |
Metadata on TACD | 2.87% | 1.52% | |
Impact of the weighting model | PL2 | 2.87% | 1.52% |
BM25 | 5.36% | 3.47% | |
Impact of the co-citation network | Without re-ranking | 5.36% | 3.47% |
With re-ranking | 6.76% | 4.22% | |
Impact of the use of IPC codes | No IPC codes | 6.76% | 4.22% |
IPC codes | 5.88% | 3.66% |
The best tuning for each strategy is displayed in bold. P0 indicates the top-precision and MAP represents the mean average precision.