Table 8.
CHIP name | reference build | sequences analyzed | time |
---|---|---|---|
HumanOmni 1S | 37.1 | 17 | 13 m |
HumanOmni 1S | 37.3 | 17 | 12 m |
CNV370 v. 3.0 | 36.1 | 56 | 41 m |
CNV370 v. 3.0 | 37.3 | 81 | 49 m |
HH300 v. 2.0 | 36.1 | 10 | 22 m |
HH300 v. 2.0 | 37.3 | 36 | 27 m |
A summarization of the performance in terms of running time at the second stage of the G-SNPM. The table shows the number of sequences that G-SNPM tried to align at the second stage and the time required to align them. It is evident a considerable imbalance of the processing time between the first and the second level. The table summarizes the performance with option "D" disabled.