Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 13;4(3):261–268. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12033

Table 2. Incidence rate and adjusted hazard ratio for type 2 diabetes during the 7‐year follow up according to family history of diabetes in 3,517 Japanese men and women.

  No family history Family history Father only Mother only Sibling only ≥2 family members
n 2,887 630 299 181 75 75
Cases 166 62 20 25 8 9
Person‐years of follow up 16,465 3,631 1,765 1,027 402 437
Incidence rate

(/1,000 person‐years)
10.1 17.1 11.3 24.3 19.9 20.6
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Model 1 1 (reference) 1.82 (1.36–2.43) 1.26 (0.79–2.01) 2.60 (1.71–3.97) 1.76 (0.86–3.58) 1.98 (1.01–3.87)
Model 2 1 (reference) 1.81 (1.36–2.43) 1.21 (0.76–1.93) 2.75 (1.80–4.19) 1.91 (0.94–3.90) 1.85 (0.95–3.62)
Model 3 1 (reference) 1.78 (1.32–2.37) 1.21 (0.76–1.93) 2.56 (1.67–3.92) 2.06 (1.01–4.20) 1.95 (0.99–3.82)
Model 4 1 (reference) 1.78 (1.33–2.38) 1.21 (0.76–1.93) 2.56 (1.67–3.92) 2.05 (1.00–4.18) 1.95 (0.99–3.81)
Model 5 1 (reference) 1.84 (1.36–2.47) 1.29 (0.80–2.08) 2.56 (1.67–3.92) 1.95 (0.95–4.00) 1.98 (1.01–3.91)

CI, confidence interval;

Model 1, adjusted for age and sex;

Model 2, adjusted for age, sex and body mass index;

Model 3, adjusted for Model 2 variables plus smoking, alcohol consumption, habitual exercise, occupational class, and presence of hypertension, dyslipidemia and hypercholesterolemia;

Model 4, adjusted for Model 3 variables plus total energy intake;

Model 5, adjusted for Model 4 variables plus homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance.