Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 18;14:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

Table 2.

Number (%) of statistically significant Cochrane meta-analyses according to the DerSimonian-Laird and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman methods

Outcome Selected meta-analyses N DL test significant HKSJ test significant HKSJ test not significant, positive DL test
Continuous
All
255
130 (51.0)
102 (40.0)
31/130 (23.8)
 
Ratio > 5, < = 5 studies
46
22 (47.8)
13 (28.3)
13/22 (59.1)
Dichotomous
All
434
185 (42.6)
147 (33.9)
48/185 (25.9)
  Ratio > 5, < = 5 studies 76 28 (36.8) 15 (19.7) 14/28 (50.0)

All: all meta-analyses with a continuous or dichotomous outcome that fulfilled the following criteria: the first meta-analysis in a review in the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews Issues of 2012, based on at least three studies. Ratio >5, < = 5 studies: a selection of these meta-analyses based on at most five studies, where the ratio of the largest vs. the smallest trial size was > 5. DL: DerSimonian & Laird meta-analysis method. HKSJ: Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman meta-analysis method. DL test significant: DL p-value <0.05; HKSJ test significant: HKSJ p-value < 0.05. Note that in a few cases the HKSJ test was significant when the DL test was not.