Skip to main content
. 2014 May 9;9(5):e96182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096182

Table 1. Results of ANOVAs on the effect of the experimental variables on microbial community.

MicBM F:B ratio Fungi Gram+ Gram-
Df F value P F value P F value P F value P F value P
Block 3 9.33 <0.001 3.54 0.019 8.20 <0.001 8.64 <0.001 6.64 <0.001
Bare grounds 1 18.83 <0.001 8.93 0.004 16.10 <0.001 15.30 <0.001 18.19 <0.001
PSR 1 13.60 <0.001 0.09 0.768 2.65 0.108 8.70 0.004 13.84 <0.001
FG 1 0.03 0.858 6.72 0.012 11.70 <0.001 0.00 0.968 0.00 0.974
legumes 1 0.00 0.983 21.74 <0.001 9.83 0.002 0.01 0.933 0.26 0.609
Grasses 1 1.62 0.207 1.83 0.180 0.08 0.775 4.83 0.031 0.93 0.339
Tall herbs 1 0.10 0.757 0.97 0.329 0.13 0.725 0.27 0.607 0.09 0.763
Small herbs 1 0.47 0.496 2.72 0.103 0.41 0.524 1.33 0.252 0.45 0.506

Impact of plant diversity (plant species richness (PSR, log transformed) and number plant functional groups (FG)) and presence of distinct plant functional groups (legumes, grasses, small herbs, tall herbs) on total microbial biomass (MicBM), Gram-positive (Gram+), Gram-negative bacteria (Gram−), fungal biomass (Fungi) and the composition of the soil community, characterized by the fungal-to-bacterial biomass ration (F:B ratio). Numbers in bold display p values < 0.05 and numbers in italic display p values <0.1.