Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Nov 14;39(6):1374–1383. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24300

Table 2.

Summary of FA values for the ulnar nerve acquired with different scan parameters.

A B C D E F G H
Spatial 1×1 1×1 1×1 1×1 1×1 1×1 1×1 1.8×1.8
Resolution
#DGED 42 21 7 21 21 21 42 42
#repetitions 2 4 12 4 2 1 2 2
FA 0.746±0.031 0.762±0.037 0.786±0.050 0.762±0.037 0.772±0.046 0.797±0.062 0.746±0.037 0.699±0.045
A p values 0.04409 0.00031
B 0.02059
C
D 0.18405 0.00619
E 0.04650
F
G 0.00001
H

The FA values were averaged over multiple measurements during optimization processes. The p values are based on the t-test in which the FA values with different acquisition schemes were compared.

A,B,C,D,E,F,G, and H indicate different acquisition conditions.

FA= Fractional Anisotropy

DGED= diffusion gradient encoding directions

p values=student’s t-test among different acquisition conditions, for example, p=0.04409 between A and B