Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 1;472(6):1749–1761. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3441-5

Table 5.

Biologics and fusion rates

Study Biologics Fusion rates/time/imaging
Anand et al., 2008 [5] rhBMP2, Grafton Putty DBM NR
Benglis et al., 2008 [9] rhBMP2 100% 6 months, XR or CT
Anand et al., 2010 [6] rhBMP2, Grafton Putty DBM 100 % 1 year, XR or CT
Dakwar et al., 2010 [13] rhBMP2 80% 6 months, XR or CT
Tormenti et al., 2010 [39]

XLIF: AF versus DBM

TLIF: IC versus BMP

NR
Wang and Mummaneni, 2010 [43] BMP ± facet versus vertebral body versus iliac crest versus rib autograft versus allograft 100% interbody levels, 71.4% posterolateral levels without interbody fusion, fine-cut CT
Isaacs et al., 2010 [25] Yes, not specified NR
Marchi et al., 2012 [30] NR NR
Wang, 2012 [42] NR NR
Deukmedjian et al., 2012 [16] Allograft NR
Deukmedjian et al., 2013 [15] NR 100% 1 year, CT
Anand et al., 2013 [4] XLIF: rhBMP2, Grafton Putty DBM 94.4% 2 years, NR
AxialLIF: rhBMP2, local autograft, DBM
Caputo et al., 2012 [10] Allograft cellular bone matrix XLIF: 88.2% 1 year, CT; XLIF + ALIF: 90.9% 1 year, CT

AF = Actifuse bone graft; DMB = demineralized bone matrix; IC = autologous Iliac crest; BMP = bone morphogenic protein; XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; XR = dynamic radiograph; NR = not reported.