Table 7.
Spearman’s rho correlations between context and research use by nursing home site
| Alberta context tool domains |
Site 1 correlations (p) (n=26) |
Site 2 correlations (p) (n=44) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptual research use ‡ | Information sources | Conceptual research use ‡ | Information sources | |
| Leadership‡ |
.59 (.002) |
.41 (.04) |
.29 (.06) |
.20 (.20) |
| Culture‡ |
.30 (.14) |
.04 (.86) |
.35 (.02) |
.34 (.02) |
| Evaluation‡ |
.22 (.28) |
-.03 (.90) |
.32 (.03) |
.30 (.048) |
| Formal Interactions |
.30 (.13) |
.10 (.65) |
.14 (.37) |
.35 (.02) |
| Informal Interactions |
.23 (.27) |
.40 (.04) |
-.02 (.89) |
.11 (.50) |
| Social Capital‡ |
.46 (.02) |
.10 (.61) |
.34 (.03) |
.18 (.26) |
| Structural Resources |
.05 (.81) |
.18 (.38) |
.30 (.045) |
.44 (.003) |
| Organizational Slack - Staff‡ |
.32 (.12) |
.20 (.33) |
.14 (.38) |
.22 (.15) |
| - Space‡ |
-.36 (.07) |
.05 (.79) |
.33 (.03) |
.48 (.0009) |
| - Time‡ | .34 (.09) | .45 (.02) | .16 (.30) | .50 (.0006) |
Spearman’s rho correlations were computed for variables with count data.
‡Pearson’s correlations were computed for variables with continuous data.