Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 6;14:235. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-235

Table 11.

Numbers and percentage of cohort and their average BMIs in different regions of the city adjusting for gender and age

Age, yr Home location
Within 1st ring
Between the 1st and 2nd ring
Outside the 2nd ring
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
N (%) Avg BMI (SD) N (%) Avg BMI (SD) N (%) Avg BMI (SD) N (%) Avg BMI (SD) N (%) Avg BMI (SD) N (%) Avg BMI (SD)
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.5)
19.3 (N/A)
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 (2.6)
24.7 (3.08)
0
0
1 (0.5)
22.9 (N/A)
15
0
0
3 (8.3)
20.1 (1.51)
1 (1.5)
19.7 (N/A)
5 (6.5)
21.3 (3.50)
4 (3.0)
19.5 (1.46)
11 (5.6)
20.7 (1.82)
16
28 (71.8)
21.7 (3.58)
30 (83.3)
21.6 (3.11)
45 (68.2)
21.4 (3.97)
58 (75.3)
20.5 (2.78)
93 (70.5)
21.3 (3.83)
152 (77.9)
20.8 (2.55)
17
11 (28.2)
21.9 (2.46)
3 (8.3)
19.4 (1.24)
18 (27.3)
21.7 (4.45)
11 (14.3)
21.5 (2.71)
28 (21.2)
21.3 (3.33)
28 (14.4)
20.7 (2.70)
18 and above
0
0
0
0
2 (3.0)
22.8 (2.84)
1 (1.3)
17.4 (N/A)
7 (5.3)
23.8 (7.43)
2 (1.0)
19.3 (0.03)
Total 39 (100) 21.8 (3.27) 36 (100) 21.3 (2.95) 66 (100) 21.5 (4.01) 77 (100) 20.8 (2.86) 132 (100) 21.4 (3.95) 195 (100) 20.8 (2.51)

Percentage of students aged 16-17 and their average BMIs in different regions of the city were BOLD as more than 85% of the students were between ages 16 and 17.