Table 4.
Subgroup Analysis in Men and Women
| Unweighted analyses |
Weighted analyses |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin | Average rank | prank | Heterogeneity (restricted)* | Average rank | prank | Heterogeneity (restricted)* |
| Men LS | ||||||
| 7.2 | 96.60 | 0.008 | − (−) | 95.45 | 0.013 | − (−) |
| 6.5 | 95.60 | 0.010 | No (no) | 101.50 | 0.004 | No (no) |
| 15.2 | 94.40 | 0.013 | − (no) | 91.94 | 0.027 | No (no) |
| 6.4 | 94.40 | 0.013 | No (++) | 105.68 | 0.001 | No (+) |
| 5.3 | 94.10 | 0.013 | No (no) | 94.50 | 0.018 | No (no) |
| 12.6 | 92.20 | 0.019 | No (no) | 83.97 | 0.079 | No (no) |
| 6.6 | 89.20 | 0.031 | No (no) | 91.03 | 0.030 | No (no) |
| 7.3 | 88.70 | 0.034 | − (no) | 87.67 | 0.049 | − (no) |
| 9.1 | 88.40 | 0.036 | No (no) | 80.01 | 0.120 | No (no) |
| Women LS | ||||||
| 1.6 | 87.71 | 0.016 | No (no) | 90.01 | 0.018 | No (no) |
| 3.1 | 86.43 | 0.024 | No (no) | 94.38 | 0.008 | No (no) |
| 3.2 | 85.93 | 0.025 | No (no) | 94.81 | 0.007 | No (no) |
| 11.3 | 83.71 | 0.036 | No (no) | 89.18 | 0.022 | No (no) |
| 1.5 | 83.21 | 0.041 | No (no) | 78.19 | 0.115 | No (no) |
| 11.2 | 79.86 | 0.067 | No (no) | 85.23 | 0.042 | No (no) |
| Men FN | ||||||
| 12.3 | 91.40 | 0.021 | No (no) | 87.06 | 0.051 | No (no) |
| 22.1 | 90.90 | 0.023 | No (no) | 85.90 | 0.059 | No (no) |
| 9.4 | 89.90 | 0.028 | No (no) | 89.69 | 0.036 | No (no) |
| 2.8 | 88.00 | 0.037 | No (no) | 88.45 | 0.043 | No (no) |
| 3.2 | 86.80 | 0.045 | No (no) | 82.60 | 0.086 | No (no) |
| Women FN | ||||||
| 15.2 | 101.80 | 0.002 | − (no) | 97.63 | 0.009 | No (no) |
| 17.1 | 101.40 | 0.003 | − (no) | 100.59 | 0.004 | − (no) |
| 17.2 | 93.80 | 0.015 | No (no) | 87.64 | 0.050 | No (no) |
| 15.1 | 90.80 | 0.023 | No (no) | 85.36 | 0.067 | − (no) |
| 1.9 | 88.60 | 0.034 | No (no) | 84.89 | 0.076 | No (no) |
| 18.4 | 86.10 | 0.049 | No (no) | 75.73 | 0.187 | No (no) |
| 4.6 | 82.00 | 0.082 | No (no) | 88.20 | 0.047 | No (no) |
| 15.3 | 74.80 | 0.183 | +++ (+++) | 89.64 | 0.038 | No (++) |
*
For heterogeneity testing, significantly low heterogeneity is given by the minus sign and significantly high heterogeneity is given by the plus sign; the number of signs corresponds to how many of the three heterogeneity statistics give significant results.
FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine.