Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;20(18):5308–5319. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5308

Table 3.

Studies of bridging therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplant n (%)

Ref. Treatment Tumor stage (n) Number of treatments Exclusion for LT Tumor progression Waiting time to LT (mo) Intention to treat survival Transplanted patients Patient survival after LT
Graziadei et al[9] TACE Within MC (48) 2.5 (1-8) MC 0 (0) 6.0 (0.9-15) 94% at 5 yr 41 (85) 94% at 5 yr
Yao et al[69] TACE, RFA, PEI, resection Within MC (70) 3.1 (1-8) UCSF 18 (26) 6.1 57% at 3 yr 38 (54) NA
Hayashi et al[29] TACE Within MC (20) ? MC 4 (20) 11.4 ± 9.8 61% at 5 yr 12 (60) 100% at 4 yr
Maddala et al[27] TACE Within MC (47), 3 (1-4) MC 6 (11) 7.0 (1-36) 61% at 5 yr 46 (85) 74% at 5 yr
Beyond MC (7)
Mazzaferro et al[33] RFA Within MC (40), 1 MC 0 (0) 9.5 (2-47) NA 50 (100) 83% at 3 yr
Beyond MC (10)
Lu et al[34] RFA Within MC (42), 1.5 MC 3 (6) 12.7 74% at 3 yr 41 (79) 76% at 3 yr
Beyond MC (10)
Millonig et al[10] TACE Within MC (68) 2.7 ± 1.7 UCSF 2 (3) 9.0 (1.2-34) 70% at 5 yr 66 (97) NA
De Luna et al[32] TACI Within MC (95) 1.8 ± 1.1 MC 6 (6) 11.4 (1.0-133) 85% at 3 yr 68 (72) 82.4% at 3 yr

HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; LT: Liver transplant; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization; MC: Milan criteria; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; PEI: Percutaneous ethanol injection; UCSF: University of California at San Francisco; TACI: Transarterial chemo-infusion; NA: Not available.