Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;20(18):5548–5556. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis of primary pooled outcome in the randomized controlled trials

Items Adjusted pooled outcome of RCTs with article excluded
Heterogeneity I2 (P) P value RR or Peto OR (95%CI)
Complete stone removal rate 0% (0.70) 0.63 1.01 (0.97-1.06)
Complete ductal clearance in one session 58% (0.07) 0.37 1.06 (0.93-1.22)
Requirement of EML 27% (0.25)  0.007a 0.64 (0. 46-0.89)
Overall adverse events 0% (1.00) 0.24 0.69 (0.37-1.29)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis 0% (0.93) 0.61 0.80 (0.35-1.86)
hemorrhage 35% (0.22) 0.68 0.69 (0.12-4.01)
perforation 0% (0.99) 0.09 0.14 (0.01-1.40)
Acute cholangitis 0% (0.70) 0.72 0.72 (0.12-4.20)
a

Significant difference (P < 0.05). RCT: Randomized controlled trial; EML: Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.