Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 13;70(2):154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.04.020

Table 3.

Statistical analysis of peri-Implant sulcular depth values (group A vs group B).

Groups Time Mesial
Midbuccal
Distal
Lingual
Mean PD ± SD t∗∗P Mean PD ± SD t∗∗P Mean PD ± SD t∗∗P Mean PD ± SD t∗∗P
Group A 6M 2.200 ± 0.775 0.21
0.836
NS
1.867 ± 0.834 0.21
0.833
NS
1.400 ± 0.507 1.17
0.254
NS
1.600 ± 0.632 0.55
0.590
NS
Group B 2.267 ± 0.961 1.933 ± 0.884 1.667 ± 0.724 1.733 ± 0.704
Group A 9M 2.400 ± 0.737 0.80
0.432
NS
2.333 ± 0.816 0.44
0.662
NS
1.933 ± 0.458 0.84
0.410
NS
1.733 ± 0.884 0.45
0.657
NS
Group B 2.600 ± 0.632 2.467 ± 0.834 1.800 ± 0.414 1.600 ± 0.737
Group A 12M 2.800 ± 0.941 0.76
0.456
NS
2.067 ± 0.961 0.55
0.587
NS
2.067 ± 0.799 0.40
0.696
2.333 ± 0.816 0.44
0.662
NS
Group B 2.533 ± 0.990 2.27 ± 1.03 1.93 ± 1.03 2.467 ± 0.834

P > 0.05 NS, ≤0.05 S, ≤0.01 HS.

NS: non significant.

S: significant.

HS: highly significant.

Paired ‘t’ test (intragroup comparisons).

∗∗ Unpaired ‘t’ test (Intergroup comparison).