Table 2.
Overview of advantages and disadvantages of various scaffolds
Scaffold | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Porous scaffolds | High porosity | Use of highly toxic solvent |
Interconnected structure | Low pore interconnectivity | |
Simple and easy to manufacture | Difficulty in homogenous cell seeding post scaffold fabrication | |
Highly porous scaffolds can have weak mechanical properties | ||
Lack of control over scaffold thickness | ||
Fibrous scaffolds | Fiber meshes and fiber bonding are simple techniques | Fiber meshes lack mechanical integrity |
Large surface area-volume ratio | Fiber bonding lacks control over porosity and pore size | |
High inter-fiber distances for nutrition and gas exchange | Small pore sizes produced during fabrication processes such as electrospinning limit cell infiltration and 3-D cellular integration with host tissue after implantation | |
Hydrogels | Can form stable and highly ordered scaffolds using self assembly | |
Tissue like flexibility | Higher cost | |
Viscoelasticity | Non-adherent and usually need to be secured by a secondary dressing, for in-vivo testing | |
Custom scaffolds (Computer-aided design technique) | Intestinal flow and diffusive transport | Natural polymer hydrogels like collagen gelatin, alginate and agarose may evoke inflammatory responses |
Controlled matrix architecture: size, shape, interconnectivity, branching, geometry and orientation | Low resolution of current systems | |
Can control pore and pore size | Selective polymeric materials can only be used | |
Controlled mechanical properties and degradation kinetics | ||
Microspheres | Reproducible architecture and compositional variations | |
Used as cell carriers, when fabricated using biodegradable and non-toxic materials | Difficult to remove once injected or implanted | |
Large surface area for cell attachment and growth | Unknown toxicity associated with microsphere/beads | |
Native/Extracellular matrix scaffolds | Applicable for 3-D cell culture in a stirred suspension bioreactor Simulates the cell's natural microenvironment in terms of composition, bioactive signal and mechanical properties | Difficult to control degree of decellularization and retain all ECM |
Non-uniform distribution of cells | ||
Immunogenicity upon incomplete decellularization |