Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 18;5(2):80–88. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.80

Table 2.

Overview of advantages and disadvantages of various scaffolds

Scaffold Advantages Disadvantages
Porous scaffolds High porosity Use of highly toxic solvent
Interconnected structure Low pore interconnectivity
Simple and easy to manufacture Difficulty in homogenous cell seeding post scaffold fabrication
Highly porous scaffolds can have weak mechanical properties
Lack of control over scaffold thickness
Fibrous scaffolds Fiber meshes and fiber bonding are simple techniques Fiber meshes lack mechanical integrity
Large surface area-volume ratio Fiber bonding lacks control over porosity and pore size
High inter-fiber distances for nutrition and gas exchange Small pore sizes produced during fabrication processes such as electrospinning limit cell infiltration and 3-D cellular integration with host tissue after implantation
Hydrogels Can form stable and highly ordered scaffolds using self assembly
Tissue like flexibility Higher cost
Viscoelasticity Non-adherent and usually need to be secured by a secondary dressing, for in-vivo testing
Custom scaffolds (Computer-aided design technique) Intestinal flow and diffusive transport Natural polymer hydrogels like collagen gelatin, alginate and agarose may evoke inflammatory responses
Controlled matrix architecture: size, shape, interconnectivity, branching, geometry and orientation Low resolution of current systems
Can control pore and pore size Selective polymeric materials can only be used
Controlled mechanical properties and degradation kinetics
Microspheres Reproducible architecture and compositional variations
Used as cell carriers, when fabricated using biodegradable and non-toxic materials Difficult to remove once injected or implanted
Large surface area for cell attachment and growth Unknown toxicity associated with microsphere/beads
Native/Extracellular matrix scaffolds Applicable for 3-D cell culture in a stirred suspension bioreactor Simulates the cell's natural microenvironment in terms of composition, bioactive signal and mechanical properties Difficult to control degree of decellularization and retain all ECM
Non-uniform distribution of cells
Immunogenicity upon incomplete decellularization