Table 1.
Design type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Case series | Suitable for rare diseases or new treatments | No comparison group |
Retrospective nature | ||
Case control | Small sample size | Presence of confounding |
Short duration | Retrospective nature | |
Cohort studies | Evaluates risk factors | Presence of confounding |
Compares two treatments | ||
May be prospective | ||
Randomized controlled trials | Prospective in nature | Limited generalizability |
Reduce confounding and bias | Potential for low recruitment and high crossover | |
High cost and administrative oversight | ||
Systematic review | Provides summation of available literature | Dependent on quality of individual studies |
Adapted from Fisher et al[5].