Skip to main content
. 2014 Winter;7(1):55–62.

Table 5.

Comparison of carotid intima-media thickness among three groups

CIMT Diabetics with fatty liver (n=49) Non- diabetics with fatty liver (n=50) Non- diabetics without fatty liver (n=52) p-value# p-value$
Right (0.6) 0.61±0.15 [0.4-1.1] (0.6) (0.5) 0.53±0.11 [0.3-0.9] (0.5) (0.4) 0.45±0.13 [0.3-0.8] (0.4) <0.001* 0.064
Left (0.6) 0.61±0.13 [0.4-0.9] (0.5) 0.54±0.11 [0.3-1] (0.4) 0.44±0.12 [0.3-0.8] 0.004* 0.106
Max (0.6) 0.63±0.15 [0.4-1.1] (0.5) 0.54±0.11 [0.3-1] (0.4) 0.45±0.13 [0.3-0.8] <0.001* 0.047

Data were presented as median ± standard deviation [range]

*

Non-parametric tests; CIMT: carotid intima-media thickness

#

Univariate

$

Multivariate: Adjusted for sex, smoking, hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, daily walking, elevated liver enzymes