Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2014 Feb;39(1):124–131. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9748-z

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Fruit and Vegetable Intake

Fruit Intake
Variable Level OR 95% CI p-value
Employment status Employed
Not employed		 1.39 0.84, 2.28 0.19
Last check-up ≤1 year
>1 year		 1.59 0.74, 3.39 0.24
Collective efficacy [continuous]* 1.57 1.18, 2.07 0.002
Neighborhood satisfaction [continuous]* 0.95 0.92, 0.98 0.71
Dietary self-efficacy [continuous]* 1.56 1.19, 2.04 0.001
Vegetable Intake
Variable Level OR 95% CI p-value
Age [continuous] 1.19 0.91, 1.54 0.20
Last check-up ≤1 year
>1 year		 1.54 0.68, 3.50 0.30
Community organization One or more
None		 1.40 0.82, 2.37 0.22
Collective efficacy [continuous]* 1.25 0.94, 1.65 0.12
Neighborhood satisfaction [continuous]* 0.92 0.70, 1.21 0.54
Dietary self-efficacy [continuous]* 1.96 1.46, 2.63 0.0001
Physical activity self-efficacy [continuous]* 1.25 0.96, 1.60 0.07
*

OR for continuous variables represent 1 SD unit change.

*

OR for continuous variables represent 1 SD unit change.