Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;48(9):5085–5092. doi: 10.1021/es5001352

Table 1. Method Performance and Concentrations of N-Nitrosamines in U.S. Biosolids.

      recovery (%)b
  biosolids concentration (ng/g) avg. (min, max)c
   
compound CAS# molecular weight (g/mol) absolute relative method detection limit (ng/g dw) wet weight dry weight RPDd (%) detection frequency (%)
NDMA 62-75-9 74 32 ± 12 110 ± 11 5.7 150 (54, 248) 504 (87, 920) 34 3
NMEAa 10595-95-6 88 32 ± 7   1.1 11.4 (5.5, 14) 121 (20, 393) 12 5
NDPA 621-64-7 130 41 ± 12 100 ± 5 0.6 44 (2.4, 314) 134 (7, 505) 46 ± 20 21
NDBAa 924-16-3 158 38 ± 14   0.1 0.7 (0.2, 1.9) 1.8 (0.2, 3.3) 21 ± 23 9
NPYRa 930-55-2 100 51 ± 8   2.3 3.8 7.6 15 1
NPIP 100-75-4 114 52 ± 7 100 ± 4 1.1 78 (12, 224) 332 (51, 1185) 15 11
NDPhA 86-30-6 198 68 ± 18 90 ± 10 0.06 4.5 (0.1, 91) 10 (0.7, 147) 23 ± 29 79
a

Concentrations of analytes lacking stable-isotope labeled analogues are not recovery corrected.

b

Relative recoveries were determined using area ratios of analyte to (stable-isotope labeled) surrogate standard. Absolute recoveries were obtained using absolute areas instead of area ratios. Absolute recoveries were determined from matrix spike studies.

c

Dry weight concentrations were calculated from wet weight concentrations using the solids content of the biosolids samples.

d

RPD: relative percentage difference.