Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 9;2(8):644–649. doi: 10.1021/ml2001196

Table 1. Comparison of (S)-9b and (S)-11b.

  (S)-9b (S)-11b
Ki (hCRTH2) (nM) 13 15
eosinophil chemotaxis IC50 (nM) 62 7.4
hWB assay IC50 (nM) 1800 69
Fu (h, r, m, %) <1%/ ND/ND 2.3/3.0/6.3
Caco-2 permeation Papp (cm/s) 1.8 × 10–6 0.2 × 10–6
clearance in rat (L/kg/h) 0.72 0.15
oral bioavailability in rat (Fz, %) 5 6