Skip to main content
. 2011 May 9;2(8):571–576. doi: 10.1021/ml2000388

Table 1. 5-HT3R Binding Affinities of Bivalent Ligands 35 and Reference Monovalent Ligands 6.

compd probea spacer (met. equiv.)b Ki (nM)c RPd
3a MPQC –(CH2)6– (6) 28 ± 7.1 10
3b MPQC –(CH2)7– (7) 2.7 ± 0.7 1
3c MPQC –(CH2)8– (8) 67 ± 15 25
3d MPQC –CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2– (8) 7.7 ± 1.5 3
3e MPQC –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)6–CH2–CH2– (23) 27 ± 8.2 10
3f MPQC –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)8–CH2–CH2– (29) 15 ± 2.4 5
4a tacrine –(CH2)6– (6) 71 ± 22 13
4be tacrine –(CH2)7– (7) 5.6f 1
4c tacrine –(CH2)8– (8) 69 ± 17 12
5be UAA –(CH2)7– (7) 26g 1
5de UAA –CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2– (8) 141g 5
5e UAA –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)6–CH2–CH2– (23) 106 ± 18 4
5f UAA –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)8–CH2–CH2– (29) 154 ± 21 6
6a NH-Boc –(CH2)6– (6) 178 ± 32 10
6b NH-Boc –(CH2)7– (7) 18 ± 3.1 1
6c NH-Boc –(CH2)8– (8) 127 ± 23 7
6d NH-Boc –CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2–O–CH2–CH2– (8) 132 ± 25 7
6e NH-Boc –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)6–CH2–CH2– (23) 89 ± 18 5
6f NH-Boc –CH2–CH2–O–(CH2–CH2–O)8–CH2–CH2– (29) 71 ± 17 4
a

See Figure 1.

b

Methylene equivalents.

c

Each value is the mean ± SEM of three determinations and represents the concentration producing half the maximum inhibition of [3H]granisetron (final concentration, 1 nM) specific binding to rat cortical membranes.

d

Relative potency with respect to the compound bearing the heptamethylene spacer (expressed as the ratio between the Ki value of the compound and that of the analogue showing the same probe and the heptamethylene spacer).

e

Compounds 4b and 5b,d are cited in the introduction as 1 and 2a,b, respectively.

f

See ref (5).

g

See ref (6).