Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2013 Nov 23;82(7):1128–1141. doi: 10.1002/prot.24478

Table III.

Total binding energies for crystal packing interfaces in the simulated latticesa

5CRO lattice (originally solved as WT)b 2OVG lattice (originally solved as mutant)c
All No site With site All No site With site
WT −350.51 ± 14.93d −322.72 ± 12.44 −27.79 ± 2.49 −82.33 ± 9.14 −70.27 ± 7.32 −12.06 ± 1.82
mutant −337.12 ± 17.15 −298.63 ± 14.45 −38.49 ± 2.70 −90.68 ± 5.33 −73.56 ± 4.22 −17.12 ± 1.11
difference −13.39 ± 22.74 −24.09 ± 19.07 10.70 ± 3.67 8.35 ± 10.58 3.29 ± 8.45 5.06 ± 2.13
a

The sum of MM-PBSA binding energies (kcal/mol) for the WT and mutant lattices are presented for three different sets of crystal packing interfaces: all interfaces (“All”), those without a mutation site (“No site”), and those that involve a mutation site (“With site”). Differences between the energies in the WT and mutant simulations are defined as WT – mutant and are shown in bold in the last row.

b

Fourteen total interfaces are present in the 5CRO lattice, four of which involve a mutation site.

c

Six total interfaces are present in the 2OVG lattice, one of which involves a mutation site.

d

Standard errors for the WT and mutant binding energies are computed as in Tables I and II. For the difference in energy terms (bold numbers), the standard errors are reported as the square root of the sum of the squares of the WT and mutant errors.