Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;13:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-35

Table 2.

Mean BMI ± standard deviation of the study population by socioeconomic status (SES) in men (n = 1522) and women (n = 1818)

Method of describing SES Men Women
Time period individually
 
 
SES at the age of 40 (t 1 )
 
 
 Advantaged (0)
26.4 ± 3.3
25.7 ± 3.8*
 Disadvantaged (1)
26.4 ± 3.4
26.7 ± 4.4
SES at the age of 50 (t 2 )
 
 
 Advantaged (0)
26.4 ± 3.3
25.7 ± 3.8*
 Disadvantaged (1)
26.3 ± 3.5
26.8 ± 4.4
SES at the age of 60 (t 3 )
 
 
 Advantaged (0)
26.4 ± 3,3
25.6 ± 3.5*
 Disadvantaged (1)
26.2 ± 3.5
26.6 ± 4.4
SES trajectories across three time periods
 
t1
t2
t3
 
 
0
0
0
26.4 ± 3.5
25.3 ± 3.6**
1
0
0
26.4 ± 3.1
25.8 ± 3.4
0
1
0
26.1 ± 2.8
25.3 ± 3.1
0
0
1
26.5 ± 3.6
25.7 ± 4.9
1
1
0
25.9 ± 3.1
26.6 ± 3.1
1
0
1
26.3 ± 3.2
26.3 ± 3.4
0
1
1
25.5 ± 2.8
26.1 ± 3.8
1
1
1
26.1 ± 3.5
26.6 ± 4.4
Accumulation score: number of times ‘disadvantaged’
0
26.4 ± 3.5
25.3 ± 3.6
1
26.4 ± 3.1
25.8 ± 3.5
2
25.9 ± 3.1
26.2 ± 3.6
3 26.1 ± 3.5 26.6 ± 4.4

*P < 0.01 compared to the disadvantaged group.

**P < 0.01 compared to the stable disadvantaged group (111).

P < 0.01 compared to the most disadvantaged group (n disadvantaged = 3).