Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Biol. 2008 Jan;211(0 1):92–105. doi: 10.1242/jeb.012450

Table 2.

Agonist profiles of 5-HT and 5-HT from Panulirus and Procambarus are very similar

Drug Potency (EC50, μmol l−1)
Efficacy (%5-HT effect)
5-HT2βPan 5-HT2βPro 5-HT1αPan 5-HT1αPro 5-HT2βPan 5-HT2βPro 5-HT1αPan 5-HT1αPro
5-HT 0.052 0.27 0.0084 0.031 100 100 100 100
Dopamine 310 362 IA IA 54 19 IA IA
Octopamine IA IA IA IA IA IA IA IA
Tyramine 283 IA IA 30 32 IA IA 67
Histamine IA IA IA IA IA IA IA IA
DOI 4.5 IA Bkd NS 32 IA Bkd NS
5-CT 6.1 4.6 2.2 NS 79 50 100 NS
2-Me-5-HT 0.78 5.2 Bkd 0.043 96 104 Bkd 73
MeOTryp 1.0 1.5 4.2 NS 80 29 94 NS
N-acetyl-5-HT IA IA IA NS IA IA IA NS
Quipazine IA IA Bkd 111 IA IA Bkd 92
α-Me-HT 1.5 7.3 1.1 0.22 79 76 120 67
8-OH-DPAT 0.27 1.1 7.6 65 77 64 105 68
mCPP IA IA 139 109 IA IA 97 70
Methysergide 0.11 0.11 0.089 0.42 48 19 81 109

EC50 values (potency) and relative efficacy were calculated from dose–response curves for each drug. Efficacy is presented as a given drug’s ability to activate the receptor compared to the maximum activation obtained from 5-HT (100%). Drugs that activate one and not the other of 5-HT and 5-HT for each species are indicated in bold.

IA, inactive; Bkd, drug has background activity on non-induced cells and was not tested; NS, curve could not be fit because of complex effects of the drug. N≥3 separate experiments for each drug.

DOI, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine; 5-CT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine; 2-Me-5-HT, 2-methyl-serotonin; MeOTryp, 5-methoxytryptamine; α-Me-5-HT, α-methyl-serotonin; 8-OH-DPAT, (±)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-dipropylamino) tetralin; mCPP, 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-piperazine.