Skip to main content
. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001640

Table 3. Characteristics of the snack and non-snack schools after the interventions.

Variable Non-snack Schools n = 689 (%) Snack Schools n = 595 (%) Test Statistica p-Value
Received education messages prior to mass treatment (%)
Yes 492 (71.4) 436(73.3) χ2 = 0.089 0.77
No 197 (28.6) 159 (26.7)
Eaten something prior to mass treatment (%)
Yes 270 (49.8) 519 (92.8) χ2 = 39.825 <0.001
No 272 (50.2) 40 (7.2)
Type of food/snack taken prior to mass treatment (%)
Mango juice and doughnut 14 (5.2) 481 (92.7) χ2 = 95.333 <0.001
Maize porridge 130 (48.2) 2 (0.4)
Posho and beans 18 (6.7) 12 (2.3)
Other (pancakes, bananas, cassava, bread, and dry tea) 108 (40.0) 24 (2.3)
Self-reported uptake of praziquantel (%)
Yes 542 (78.7) 559 (93.9) χ2 = 9.683 0.002
No 147 (21.3) 36 (6.1)
Side effects attributable to praziquantel (%)
Yes 254 (46.9) 192 (34.4) χ2 = 4.181 0.041
No 288 (53.1) 367 (63.6)
Reported side effects attributable to praziquantel (%)
Abdominal pain 133 (52.4) 109 (56.8) χ2 = 0.738 0.947
Dizziness 61 (24.0) 45 (23.4)
Diarrhea 31 (12.2) 27 (14.1)
Vomiting 19 (7.5) 7 (3.6)
Other (headache, nausea) 10 (3.9) 4 (2.1)
S. mansoni infection status (%)
Positive 97 (14.1) 8 (1.3) χ2 = 10.937 0.001
Negative 592 (85.9) 587 (98.7)
Intensity of S. mansoni infection (epg)
GMI epg 78.4 38.3 t = 18.54 0.001
a

Adjusted for cluster design effect.